My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8014
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:24:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8014
Author
McDonald, W. J.
Title
The Upper Basins' Political Conundrum
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
A Deal is Not a Deal.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />The Upper Basins' Political Conundrum: A Deal is Not a Deal <br />The Missouri River Basin: The Agreements and the Results <br />Introduction <br />The headwaters of the Missouri River lie in the Rocky Mountains of western <br />Montana and northwestern Wyoming. The river's basin drains ten states -- <br />portions of those two states and of Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, Iowa, and <br />North Dakota; a very small area in the extreme southwestern corner of <br />Minnesota; nearly all of South Dakota; and the entirety of Nebraska. <br />The Missouri River Basin contrasts with the Colorado River Basin in two <br />significant regards. First, while the Colorado River Basin has a uniformly <br />arid climate, the Missouri River watershed extends from the arid climate of <br />the Great Plains in the western and northern portions of the basin to the <br />more humid climate found in Iowa, Missouri, and the eastern portions of <br />Kansas and Nebraska. Thus, irrigation is needed to sustain crop production <br />in the acid portion of the basin (Montana, the Dakotas, Wyoming, Colorado, <br />western Nebraska, and western Kansas), but not in the eastern portion of the <br />basin where rainfall is more plentiful and uniform. <br />Second, the natural, undepleted flows of the Missouri River are more than <br />four times greater than those of the Colorado River.100 For this and other <br />reasons, navigation on the lower Missouri has been a major factor in the <br />political history of this basin's development,toi unlike that of the Colorado. <br />On the other hand, both the lower Colorado and the lower Missouri have been <br />prone to devastating floods. To this extent, the history of upstream- <br />downstream conflicts in both basins share the attribute that lower basin <br />interests in both basins have been desirous of obtaining flood control <br />protection. <br />Unlike the Colorado River, the waters of the Missouri River have not been <br />apportioned on an interstate basis (by compact, decree of the U.S. Supreme <br />10° At the mouth of the Missouri River, undepleted natural flows are estimated to average <br />about 65 million acre-feet annually. J. THORSON, RIVER OF PROMISE, RIVER OF PERIL: <br />THE POLITICS OF MANAGING THE MISSOURI RIVER 14 (1994). This contrasts with <br />average annual virgin flows on the Colorado River of about 15 million acre-feet at Lee Ferry. <br />ioi For a complete history of navigation on the Missouri River, see J. FERRELL, <br />SOUNDINGS: ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF THE MISSOURI RIVER NAVIGATION <br />PROJECT (1996). <br />32 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />r <br />t <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.