Laserfiche WebLink
any living thing. Elithough the early str~ dies of food preferences were sc~tr,ewlaat <br />limited in scope, they did provide a common conclusion. S. c. utah, found in both <br />river and Pake environments, were relatively non-selective in their feeding <br />habits and other native fish were an integral part of the diets of lake popula- <br />tions. <br />Recent efforts to document food habits have been restricted to a few popula- <br />tions of S. c. Utah found in small isolated streams. During June 1975, stomachs <br />were examined from 39 cutthroat collected from Birch Creek, Beaver County, <br />Utah. Specimens ranged from 58 to 200 mm (2-8 inches) in length and from 4 to <br />96 g (.140 to 3.4 oz.) in weight. Both terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates were <br />Trout Cr. <br />Pine Cr. <br />Goshute Cr. <br />Hendrys Cr. <br />Raymond Cr <br />Birch Cr. <br />Willow Cr. <br />Water Canyon <br />Reservoir Canyon <br />0.87 9.30 19.48 29.65 39.83 50.0016.00 17.80 19.60 21.40 <br />Basibranchial Teeth Gillrakers <br />Trout Cr. L~ <br />Pine Cr. <br />G <br />h <br />t <br />C <br />os <br />u <br />e <br />r. <br />Hendrys Cr. l__ <br />Raymond Cr. <br />Birch Cr. <br />Willow Cr. <br /> <br />Water Canyon II <br />L~ <br />Reservoir Canyon <br />24 .00 30.40 <br /> Pyloric Caeca <br />36.80 43.20 49.60 56.00 33.00 35.60 38.20 40.80 43.40 46.00 <br />Scales above Lateral Line <br /> <br /> <br />l ~\y,' <br /> <br /> .~ J <br /> <br /> e~~ I <br /> SK <br /> . ~ ~ <br />i <br />Figure 2. Meristic counts of basibranchial teeth, gillrakers, pyloric caecae, and scales above the lateral line <br />for various populations of cutthroat trout from Utah and adjoining states. (The dark line indicates the <br />population mean, the shaded area of each bar indicates one standard deviation, and the entire bar indicates <br />the range for each fish population). (Data from Behnke 1976a, 1976b; Hickman 1977) <br />9 <br />23.20 25.00 <br />