My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9629
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9629
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:07:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9629
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Selected NEPA Documents.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
77 <br />C. Initiation of Formal Scoping. Initiation of an agency's scoping <br />process formally commences with Federal Register publication of a notice of <br />intent (NOI) to prepare an EIS. CEQ's NEPA regulations intend for <br />coordination to take place as fully as possible prior to release of a draft <br />EIS. At a minimum, Service input into the scoping process and our <br />responses to the NOI should indicate our general jurisdictional and/or <br />environmental concerns, proposed resolutions, or our no objection to <br />project implementation if it is determined there will be little or no <br />impact on fish and wildlife resources. -If .the proposed action may affect <br />any resources for which the Service has jurisdictional responsibility, the <br />lead agency must be notified at this time and a process established for <br />resolving any concerns. Replies to NOIs may be made directly to the lead <br />agency by the project leader pursuant to 505 FW 1.6(6)(8). <br />D. Service Participation in Scoping. <br />(I) Service personnel should normally attend scoping meetings. If <br />attendance is precluded due to travel restrictions or other commitments, <br />written Service comments from the field level should be provided in <br />accordance with instructions in the scoping invitation or public notice. <br />(2) If the Service is aware that a proposed project may have potential, <br />significant impacts on fish and wildlife resources under the jurisdiction <br />of the Service (e.g., national wildlife refuges, endangered species), the <br />Service field office should advise the sponsoring agency that the Service <br />will be participating in the scoping process and may wish (or requests) to <br />be a cooperating agency. <br />(3) Service participation in scoping should be coordinated with the <br />appropriate State agencies with regard to the conservation of fish and <br />wildlife resources of mutual interest. <br />(4) All Service reports and project recommendations must be provided to <br />the lead agency to permit incorporation into project plans, including the <br />draft EIS. <br />(5) Service reports resulting from participation in the scoping process <br />will be coordinated with other reports or compliance required by the Fish <br />and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA), Endangered Species Act, and other <br />laws. <br />(6) Service input into scoping processes should be documented in EISs, and <br />Service comments should point out any omissions or discrepancies in the use <br />of this input. The Service NEPA Reference Handbook contains a sample <br />Service comment letter to the lead Federal agency on its NOI~to prepare an <br />EIS. <br />2.4 Resolving federal Agency Planning Inconsistencies. <br />A. This section describes general guidance for resolving agency <br />differences. For example, the Service may believe another agency's actions <br />are inconsistent with CEQ's NEPA regulations. The Service may have clearly <br />indicated to the agency that their proposed action is "major or <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.