Laserfiche WebLink
550 FW 3 60 <br />Exhibit 1 <br />Page 2 of 4 - <br />PROJECT DESCR~TION <br />The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) is proposing to convey appmy I30 <br />acres of upland and submerged lands administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Bagineers <br />(Corps) to the Division of Stale Lands (Division), an agency of the State of Oregon. In <br />e,~cchange for the Federal land, the Division is proposing to convey approumatrlY 3,930 <br />acres of State-owned land within the ~tr+.:n~errative boundary of the Beluga to GSA, which <br />will in turn transfer those lands to the Service. - <br />led land eacchange, the Servicx would gain fee title ownership to certain <br />Under the propo of the Refiige which would provide a more <br />)ands within the administrative boundary ~ ~, Other <br />substantial and durable means of protecting wildlife resources from incompatzb <br />State lands within the Refuge will be managed by the Service under along-term <br />cooperative.mangemeat agreement with the Division. The Division has proposed to develop <br />a multi-tenant marine industrial park on the property conveyed to it. <br />KEY bSSUFS <br />Through public scopirtg and with input from various agencies and publics, ~Y issue ware <br />identified. These focused on the following subject. areas: I) certain aspects of the physical <br />environment, especially the potential for hazardous materials to be rrleased from local <br />sediments; 2) certain aspects of the biological environment, especially wetlands and <br />threatened and endangered spocies; and 3) certain aspects of the cultural and social <br />environment, cspecially the local and regional economy. These factors were also examined <br />for the State-owned islands Proposed as additions to the Refuge. These issues were <br />thoroughly examined in the Draft and Final IIS. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />More than 20 alternatives were considered before limiting the alternatives ~ ~ ~~ for <br />further study, Alternatives considered but not advancod for detailed analy ' <br />alternative development concepts, alternative sites, and single versus multi-tenant <br />developments. Alternatives advancod for detailed analysis include (A) the Proposed land <br />exchange and development of amulti-tenant marine '~ usttiai d~~ ~~ t~~ ~ ~~~ <br />land exchange and multi-tenant marine industrial acv op <br />Tongue Point; and (C) a No Action Alternative. Adverse and beneficial impacts of each <br />alternative are considered. <br />a.~terna, five A <br />Alternative A comprises two elements: (1) the land pcchange, acid (2) the multi-tuiant marine <br />industrial development <br />(1) Approximately 3,930 acres of State-owned land within the administrative boundary of <br />the Lewis and Clark National Wildlife Refuge would be exchanged through GSA to the <br />ENVIRONMENTAL atIALITY <br />