Laserfiche WebLink
IL <br />J <br />A less obvious impact of sportfishing on native fishes may be the result of <br />take by angling or seining for bait. Colorado squawfish and humpback chub <br />captures by anglers have been documented since 1979 by the Colorado Division <br />of Wildlife (Colorado) and Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (Utah) and <br />since 1980 by the Colorado River Fisheries Project (Fisheries Project). The <br />Fisheries Project and Utah have reported 33 Colorado squawfish captures and <br />6 humpback chub captures by fishermen. Through studies, Colorado has <br />' captured 29 Colorado squawfish (1979-85) and 30 humpback chub (1979-82) by <br />angling. These reported captures may represent only a fraction of the total <br />captures of rare fishes by anglers each year, many are returned alive. In <br />addition, humpback chub and Colorado squawfish are prone to ingest live bait <br />used by anglers for catfish as well as artificial spoons or lures. It may be <br />appropriate to restrict uses of baits entirely, since hook removal from the <br />fish can cause mortality. The State of Colorado, in coordination with the <br />' Service, has revised its sportfishing regulations to offset some of these <br />problems. <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />These data indicate that squawfish readily take a lure. This may provide an <br />opportunity to experiment with a sportfishery for squawfish now or after their <br />recovery (and delisting) to enhance the acceptance by the general public of <br />this species and its habitat needs, providing this activity does not detract <br />from the recovery program. Squawfish provided an important source of food for <br />early settlers and natives in this area. Hatcheries, as well as natural <br />reproduction (if recovered), could produce sufficient numbers of squawfish to <br />support a sportfishery in addition to meeting other stocking needs. The goal <br />of creating a sportfishery may be accomplished through various means but will <br />be dependent upon the biological and legal status of the species until the <br />species is recovered. The Service and the State of Colorado are pursuing this <br />option incidental to this program. <br />4.4.3 Selected Course of Action <br />a. Stocking of nonnative species will be confined to areas where absence of <br />potential conflict with rare or endangered species can be demonstrated. <br />This includes augmentation of existing populations of nonsalmonid fishes <br />and introductions of new populations of all nonnative fish species that <br />compete with or prey upon rare species. The States and the Service will <br />develop procedures, including studies, for reviewing and for resolving <br />disagreements with any proposed introductions into the upper basin <br />drainage. <br />b. The Service and the States will determine the impact from competition <br />and/or predation by nonnative fishes on the rare fishes (see Section 6.2). <br />If competition and predation from any nonnative species is determined, the <br />States and the Service will assess the feasibility of selectively removing <br />those nonnative species from areas considered to be essential to listed <br />species, such as grow-out ponds, spawning, or nursery sites. If necessary <br />and feasible, this activity will be implemented as soon as possible. <br />c. State sportfishing practices and regulations will be reviewed for <br />compliance with Federal law and impact on rare species. If the Service <br />and States determine that conflicts exist, such activities as permanent or <br />seasonal angling closures and restrictions on seining will be implemented <br />by the States, where appropriate. <br />4-19