My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7281
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7281
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:59:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7281
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin, Environmental Assessment, November 1987.
USFW Year
1987.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />2. Overall, the greatest potential adverse impacts arise from <br />nondiscretionary actions required under Section 7 of the Endangered <br />Species Act. These nondiscretionary actions are common to both <br />alternatives. Section 7 consultation will result in flow release <br />recommendations for Federal water projects that avoid jeopardy to <br />endangered fishes. The electrical generation, coldwater sport fish <br />and sportfishing, and recreational boating impacts which arise from <br />refinement of these dams' operations would be identical under both <br />alternatives. Moreover, since refinement of Federal dams' operations <br />account for all or most of the impacts in the above-mentioned areas, <br />there is ultimately no difference or very little difference between <br />the two alternatives' impacts on electrical generation, coldwater <br />sport fish and sportfishing, and recreational boating. <br />3. Activities contemplated under the two alternatives are often the same <br />or similar (see Table II-1-B), hence, impacts are correspondingly the <br />same or similar (see Table ES-1). If one compares the future with the <br />Recovery Implementation Program (Proposed Action) and the future <br />without the Recovery Implementation Program ("No Action" alternative), <br />this "with/without" analysis would show that the added benefits of the <br />Proposed Action are achieved with relatively small additional costs to <br />the human environment. <br />E. Consultation and Coordination with Others <br />The Recovery Implementation Program was developed by the multi-interest <br />Upper Colorado River Basin Coordinating Committee, with the assistance of <br />water development and conservation organizations. The preliminary draft <br />was circulated to 59 organizations, and the public review draft was <br />circulated to 109 organizations for review and comment. A Notice of <br />Intent was published in the Federal Register to scope out issues and <br />solicit public comment to assist in preparation of the environmental <br />assessment. The major issues surfaced during these review processes are <br />summarized in Chapter V. <br />I ES-3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.