My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7281
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7281
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:59:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7281
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin, Environmental Assessment, November 1987.
USFW Year
1987.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />C. Affected Environment <br />The area potentially affected by the Proposed Action includes all of the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin above Glen Canyon Dam but excludes the San Juan <br />River and its tributaries (See Figure III-1). <br />D. Environmental Consequences of the Alternatives <br />Prediction of future impacts is hampered by the dynamic, adaptable nature <br />of the Recovery Implementation Program. Program implementation will be <br />influenced greatly by future research results. Many actions cannot be <br />defined in detail until underlying research is completed and various <br />options for implementation are identified. Detailed impact analyses were <br />possible only in instances where detailed assumptions could be developed <br />and justified. Generalized impact analyses were prepared when detailed, <br />justifiable assumptions could not be developed. Table ES-1 summarizes <br />impacts. Major conclusions are as follows: <br />1. The Proposed Action is expected to have: <br />a. Positive impacts on rare and endangered fishes and future water <br />development in the Upper Basin. <br />b. Negative impacts on nonnative warmwater fish species which compete <br />with or prey on endangered fishes and which can be affected by <br />control measures. This may affect warmwater sportfishing for <br />these species. <br />c. Negative impacts on power revenues (in the short term) and on <br /> regional electricity rates (in the long term). These might be <br /> offset by future measures to reduce impacts, such as allowing <br /> operational flexibility at Flaming Gorge Dam. <br />d. Mixed impacts (i.e., both positive and negative impacts, depending <br /> on location, time of year, and other variables) on nonnative <br /> coldwater sport fishes, coldwater sportfishing, recreational <br /> boating, and pumping costs for waterfowl management areas. <br />e. Unpredictable, but likely minimal, impacts on nonendangered <br /> warmwater native fishes and irrigation-associated riparian <br /> habitat. <br />f. Neutral, redistributional impacts (changes that are neither <br /> positive or negative in value) on Federal water management, water <br /> rights, and natural riparian habitat. <br />l <br />i <br />t <br />g. enance, <br />ma <br />n <br />No or minimal impacts on water quality, channe <br /> coldwater native fishes, terrestrial wildlife, other endangered <br /> and threatened species, candidate species, and archaeological/ <br /> cultural resources. <br />t <br />ES-2 I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.