Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PREFACE <br />These "Genetics Management Guidelines" provide a conceptual framework of <br />genetics management and rationale for maintaining the genetic diversity of <br />wild endangered fish stocks in the Upper Colorado River Basin. They are <br />intended to serve as a practical reference document. Boxes are used to <br />highlight important parts of these guidelines. A glossary of <br />terms used in this document is provided in Appendix 1. <br />The background and evolution of the Recovery Implementation Program (Program) <br />for recovery of endangered fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin are <br />reviewed by Wydoski and Hamill (1991). A description of the Program is <br />provided in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1987a) and an assessment of the <br />environmental impacts of the Program is provided in U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br />Service (1987b). A review of genetic concepts, principles, and issues related <br />to fisheries management are concisely summarized by Kapuscinski and Jacobson <br />(1987). <br />The Program consists of five elements for recovery of endangered fishes in the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin: (1) provision of in-stream flows; (2) habitat <br />development and maintenance; (3) native fish stocking; (4) management of <br />nonnative species and sport fishing; and (5) research, monitoring, and data <br />management (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1987a, 1987b, 1993). Genetics <br />management of endangered Colorado River fishes is an integral part of the <br />Program involving habitat development and maintenance, management of wild fish <br />populations, native fish stocking, and research/monitoring efforts. <br />The conceptual framework for planning, implementing, and evaluating management <br />actions for genetics management of the endangered fish can be compared with <br />the following medical model. In the medical model, the physician reviews the <br />patient's medical history, then interviews and examines the patient to <br />determine etiology (i.e., the origin and nature of the disease or discomfort). <br />Following the physician's assessment of the patient's medical status and <br />identification of the problem (i.e., diagnosis), the physician provides a <br />prognosis that is an opinion of the problem based on the data and the <br />physician's knowledge and experience. The course of action depends upon <br />whether the problem can be treated. If the problem can be treated, the choice <br />of treatment may vary depending on the diagnosis, degree of intervention that <br />is required, the availability of qualified personnel, equipment, and <br />facilities, cost and duration of the treatment, and the expected outcome. The <br />desired outcome is evaluated in terms of the probability of treatment success <br />against the potential risks or complications, including side effects, <br />associated with the treatment. The physician and patient select a treatment <br />plan. The patient is monitored and the treatment may be continued, modified, <br />or stopped based upon the patient's response. If the treatment is considered <br />successful, the patient is considered cured and discharged. Even after <br />discharge, the patient's medical status may be routinely monitored since <br />periodic reevaluation or examination of the patient will minimize recurrence <br />of the problem or it can be treated again in an early stage when the <br />probability of a cure (i.e., success) is higher. The systems approach to <br />problem solving in this document is parallel to the adaptive management <br />approach described in the medical model. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />J <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />vi 1 <br />