Laserfiche WebLink
<br />C. Maintaining Genetic Diversity of Wild Endangered Fish in Controlled <br />Environments. Stocking of larval or juvenile wild endangered fish into <br />protected habitats has been suggested as a strategy to increase natural <br />recruitment. Even though wild, naturally spawned endangered fish larvae <br />will be stocked into protected habitats, protective custody is extensive <br />aquaculture (i.e., captive propagation) where humans have intervened and <br />the genetics risks are uncertain. Before this method is used, the <br />management objectives, opportunities, and alternative strategies should <br />be carefully considered to reduce potential genetic risks. For example, <br />stocking equal numbers from all family lots of captive-reared endangered <br />fish into protected habitats such as flooded bottomlands is a strategy <br />with more control. <br />Sections IV.C.2. and IV.C.3.. provide guidance for stocking larval <br />endangered fishes into protected habitats and comparing the genetic <br />characterization of these fish with wild stocks prior to release into any <br />river in the upper basin. <br />1. Background. The major limiting factor regarding the endangered <br />Colorado River fishes is low survival during the early life stages <br />that results in low, or lack of, recruitment. When recruitment does <br />not replace adult mortality, wild stocks decline in numbers. <br />Colorado squawfish and humpback chub stocks are considered to be low <br />but stable in the upper basin. To protect these stocks and increase <br />the numbers of fish, fishways will be constructed to mitigate the <br />loss of passage of the squawfish over dams, providing access into <br />unoccupied historic habitats. In addition, streamflows needed to <br />maintain vital habitats for both species will be defined. <br />Recruitment of wild razorback suckers, however, is low or non- <br />existent, although spawning has been documented. Therefore, attempts <br />will be made to enhance flooded bottomland habitats with the goal of <br />increasing survival of razorback suckers, and possibly bonytail, <br />during the early life stages to aid natural recruitment. The <br />evaluation of these sites as nursery areas for razorback suckers may <br />require stocking naturally spawned larvae into protected, predator- <br />free sites, an activity recommended by Dowling and Minckley (1993) to <br />augment the razorback stock in Lake Mohave. <br />2. Guidelines for Maintaining Genetic Diversity in Wild Larval <br />Endangered Fish to be Stocked in Protected Environments. Larval <br />razorback suckers should be collected from or near a known spawning <br />site near a suspected historic nursery area. Temporal sampling of <br />larvae should be made throughout the natural spawning period (April <br />through mid-June when average water temperature is about 14-15 C; <br />Tyus and Karp 1991). For example, collections could be made weekly <br />using light traps during this period. An attempt should be made to <br />collect equal numbers of larvae during each collection that is not <br />very likely. Standardized techniques should be used during all <br />collections so that mortality of larvae during capture and handling <br />remains similar among collections. Ideally, larvae from each <br />collection should be marked. However, batch-marking techniques to <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />L 17