Laserfiche WebLink
inbreeding. Broodstocks will be developed through paired matings that produce <br />pedigreed family lots. An effective population size of 50 fish will result in <br />an inbreeding rate of only 1%, which is considered to be acceptable for <br />maintaining the genetic diversity of wild fish stocks. <br />When stocks are low, a minimum breeding strategy using a 5 X 5 di-allele cross <br />will be used. A 5 X 5 breeding strategy has an effective population size of <br />10 fish and an estimated inbreeding rate of 5%. In the event that 5 males and <br />5 females are not available, a factorial mating will be used to capture the <br />genetic contribution from all fish of the least numerous sex. However, <br />additional wild adults will be used to supplement the broodstock that are <br />developed from a 5 X 5 or factorial cross when they are available. This will <br />increase the effective population size that will in turn reduce the estimated <br />inbreeding rate. <br />II. PHILOSOPHY, AND GOALS FOR GENETICS MANAGEMENT <br />A. Background. Various water development projects throughout the Region have <br />created barriers to fish passage or changed the hydrology of the river <br />systems, thereby affecting stream flows, water temperatures, sediment, and <br />habitat that are crucial to the successful recruitment of endemic fishes <br />(U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1987a, 1987b, 1990a 1990b, 1991). Non- <br />native fishes have been introduced, either intentionally or accidentally. <br />They have become established and are suspected to be competitors with, or <br />predators on, the native species (Miller et al. 1982). These biological <br />and environmental changes have resulted in the endemic fishes, razorback <br />sucker (Xyrauchen texanus), bonytail chub (Gila elegans), humpback chub <br />(Gila c ha), Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius), pallid sturgeon <br />(Scaphirhynchus albus), Neosho madtom (Noturus placidus), greenback <br />cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki stomias) and others to being listed <br />as "endangered, threatened or candidate" under the Endangered Species Act <br />of 1973, as amended. l <br />To protect endangered fishes, while allowing water development, the U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) coordinated an effort to develop the <br />Upper Colorado River Recovery Implementation Program (Program) for <br />endangered fish (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1987a. 1987b). This <br />effort includes participation by the States of Colorado, Utah, and <br />Wyoming: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Service, Western Area Power <br />Administration, water development interests, and environmental <br />organizations (Wydoski and Hamill 1991). Similar coordinated partnership <br />approaches have been undertaken for recovery of the greenback cutthroat <br />trout in Colorado. and the pallid sturgeon on the Missouri River. <br />B. Philosophy, and Goals for Genetics Management. The philosophy is to <br />maintain the genetic integrity of wild and captive-reared fishes in all <br />waters of Region 6 ( Echelle 1991: Meffe 1986). The rationale for this <br />philosophy is that natural refugia provide a source of preadapted genetic <br />diversity that increases the probability for successful recovery of the <br />species (Krueger et al. 1981: Samson 1992: Smith and Rhodes 1992).