Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Stocking Opportunities for the Razorback Sucker <br /> <br />AUimentation of Reservoir Populations Lake Powell impounds water from both the Colorado <br />and the San Juan Rivers. Both these areas contain habitats suitable to sustain adult population. <br />Information collected from the San Juan studies suggest that the establishment of reservoir <br />populations would also result in sucker migrating further upstream in more natural habitats. <br /> <br />-San Juan Inflow Area-The stocking of either the inflow area or upper reaches of the San Juan <br />River would increase the occurrence of razorback suckers inside the Park. There have been <br />discussions concerning the reestablishment or expansion of an adult razorback sucker population <br />in the San Juan Arm of Lake Powell. The inflow area was actually the location where San Juan <br />razorback suckers were last collected for brood stock in 1991 (Stangl 1993). To our knowledge, <br />no wild fish have been captured in the past six years. <br /> <br />A Memorandum of Agreement was developed between National Parks Service, Fish and Wildlife <br />Service, and Utah Department of Natural Resources in 1996. The agreement identified that <br />surplus production of razorbacks from the upper basin RIP could be stocked into a designated <br />critical habitat (San Juan Arm) of Lake Powell. The agreement does not specifically include the <br />golf course ponds, only the disposition of surplus fish. Although a Memorandum of Agreement <br />exists, the administrative process to move fish back into Lake Powell from the golf course ponds <br />is complex and involves the issuance of four special use permits. State health certification <br />required to bring fish into Utah, requires the sacrifice of a minimum of 50 fish for inspection. <br /> <br />Recent telemetry studies have shown that sucker stocked in either the reservoir or river could <br />travel significant distances and intermix (Ryder 1997, Mueller and Wydoski 1995, Karp and <br />Mueller 1996). If a goal of augmenting the reservoir population was developed separately from <br />the RIP, the expansion of reservoir numbers could also benefit San Jan RIP goals. Some fish <br />stocking further upstream would undoubtedly be lost as some fish migrated into the reservoir. <br />These numbers could be offset by establishing reservoir populations which would also migrate <br />upstream. There is information that suggests that in some instances the inflow area might actually <br />provide adults a refuge from high turbid flood flows (Karp and Mueller unpublished data). <br /> <br />The San Juan RIP recently released a draft augmentation plan that calls for the introduction of <br />several thousand, large razorback suckers (Ryder 1997). Stocking criteria identifies the use of <br />fish propagated from upper basin brood stocks or suckers naturally spawned in Lake Mohave. <br />Regardless, of whether fish are stocked in the reservoir or further upstream, the end result will <br />undoubtedly be more razorback suckers in Lake Powell. <br /> <br />-Colorado River Inflow Area- In the early to mid-1980, several razorback suckers were captured <br />near the confluence with the Dirty Devil River (Stangl 1993). Some of these fish were emitting <br />gametes at the time of capture. During the past 10 years, we are not aware of any coordinated, <br />nor large scale efforts to collect razorback suckers in the Colorado inflow area. Biologists have <br />sampled shoreline habitats using seines to capture juvenile Colorado squawfish. Juvenile <br /> <br />6 <br />