Laserfiche WebLink
<br />River, and, biotic factors such as competition are more directive in relatively benign and predictable <br />systems (Poffand Ward 1990), maintaining natural variability is important in maintaining the native fish <br />fauna in the Yampa River. <br /> <br />Macroinvertebrate community structure is a product of the physical and biological influences in the <br />environment. Gordon et al. (1992) described a number of elements that interact to give rise to the general <br />character of a stream. These elements include elevation, stream order, length, discharge, slope, and <br />substrate type. Macroinvertebrates have evolved anatomical, behavioral, and physiological characteristics <br />to adapt to the conditions oftheir environment (Poff and Ward 1989; Poff and Ward 1990). <br /> <br />Macroinvertebrate community structure is then limited by the physical and biological constraints of each <br />species and the disturbances existing in their environment. The dominant force contributing to the <br />structure of aquatic macroinvertebrate communities is dependent upon the time of year, adaptations ofthe <br />given macro invertebrates, and magnitude of the disturbance (Poff and Ward 1989). The flow regime of a <br />stream is usually considered to be one of the most important factors that influence aquatic communities <br />(Poff et al. 1997). <br /> <br />Flow is particularly important because it is often correlated with numerous other factors that influence the <br />aquatic community (Poffand Ward 1990). These factors include: depth, velocity, thermal changes, <br />renewal of resources, etc. Floods or high flows have been shown to be beneficial to disturbance <br />dependent species, whereas other species thrive in a more stable environment (Poff and Ward 1989). <br />Invertebrate communities in streams with a high degree of flow variation are typically dominated by <br />species that can efficiently colonize new areas or can behaviorally avoid adverse conditions (e.g., <br />invertebrates adapted for swimming). Streams with a low frequency of natural disturbance are generally <br />inhabited by more diverse populations of invertebrates that often are larger, more specialized, and long- <br />lived (Poff and Ward 1989). The macro invertebrate community composition of a given stream is adapted <br />to, and dependent on, the flow regime (as well as other variables) existing in that stream. Changes in the <br />natural flow regime of a system will result in changes to the aquatic communities (Poff et al. 1997). <br /> <br />Some behavior of aquatic invertebrates has been shown to be dependent on flow. Manipulation of flow <br />has been associated with an increase in drift of many species (White et al. 1981; Poff and Ward 1991). <br />Poff and Ward (1991) indicated that the drift patterns of several species of macroinvertebrates in the <br />upper Colorado River were influenced by increasing or decreasing stream flow. Several taxa responded <br />positively (increased drift) to artificially lowering the flow. These taxa included Baetis sp., Triznaka <br /> <br />27 <br />