Laserfiche WebLink
<br />catfish) and weights (twenty five randomly selected individuals and cumulative weights/reach) <br /> <br />were recorded and used characterize catch rates in all reaches (no weights were recorded by <br /> <br />electrofishing on 1998). Based on cost per fish removed in 1998, angling was selected as the <br /> <br />primary method of removal in 1999. In addition to angling in 1999, catfish collected from a <br /> <br />Recovery Implementation Program project in 1999 to estimate the population size of humpback <br /> <br />chub in Yampa Canyon were also removed. <br /> <br />Electrojishing <br /> <br />Non-motorized electrofishing rafts were used on the first trip during both years. Smith <br /> <br />Root electrofishing equipment with 5000 watt generators (60 - 120 Hz frequency) was used to <br /> <br />apply 4 - 5 amps. Two rafts (on opposing shorelines) with one person on the bow with a net <br /> <br />collected catfish from the entire length of shoreline along removal treatment reaches. Supply boats <br /> <br />occasionally collected catfish that surfaced after the electrofishing raft had passed. Number of <br /> <br />fishlhour caught was recorded and all fish captured were removed from the river. Due to floatation <br /> <br />requirements of the electrofishing raft, this method could only be used when flows exceeded <br /> <br />approximately 28 m3s. <br /> <br />Angling <br />Angling was used to remove channel catfish during the baseflow period in 1998 (second, <br /> <br /> <br />third, and eighth trip). In 1999, with the exception of a single electro fishing trip, all channel <br /> <br /> <br />catfish were removed by angling. Angling start and stop times, number of catfish captured, and <br /> <br /> <br />total weight of catfish caught were recorded by each angler on prepared data forms. Fishing time <br /> <br />was recorded when bait hit the water and ended with the last retrieval of line from the water and is <br /> <br />5 <br />