My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9432
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9432
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:27:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9432
Author
Modde, T. and M. Fuller.
Title
Feasibility of Channel Catfish Reduction in the Lower Yampa River.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
Vernal.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The Yampa River within Dinosaur National Monument was divided into four strata based <br /> <br />on a longitudinal gradient (Table 1, Figure 1). The longitudinal stratification of the reaches was an <br /> <br />effort to remove any variation associated with fish abundance that may occur in a downstream <br /> <br />gradient in the Canyon that affects bedrock type and changes in habitat occurring in the Yampa <br /> <br />River as channel substrate size declined downstream. Each stratum (between 13 and 18 kIn long) <br /> <br />was equally divided into two reaches, and the subdivided reaches were randomly designated as <br /> <br />either a treatment or control reach. Channel catfish were removed from treatment reaches during <br /> <br />each pass through the canyon. Catfish were only removed from the control reaches during the final <br /> <br />pass of the field season for comparison of relative densities from removal (treatment) and non- <br /> <br />removal (control) reaches. In 1998, fish from both control and treatment reaches were collected <br /> <br />and removed during a single trip. In 1999, greater effort was applied to each reach and two trips <br /> <br />were required to complete the final pass (two treatment and two control reaches sampled per trip). <br /> <br />Specific treatment and control reaches sampled during the last pass in 1999 were randomly <br /> <br />assigned. Strata boundaries remained constant through both years of the study. <br /> <br />During 1998 several gear types were used to determine the most efficient means of <br /> <br />removal. These methods included electrofishing, fyke nets, hoop nets, and trot lines, and angling. <br /> <br />Removal Methods <br /> <br />The initial effort in this study was directed toward identifying gear efficiency in removing <br /> <br />channel catfish. In 1998, electro fishing, angling, netting (fyke and hoop nets), and trot lines were <br /> <br />used to capture and remove channel catfish (see table 1). Effectiveness was measured by both the <br /> <br />number of fish captured per hour and cost per fish removed from the canyon. Lengths (of all <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.