My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9666
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9666
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:21:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9666
Author
VanHaverbeke, D. R. and Robert L. Simmonds Jr.
Title
Final Report - The Feasibility of Developing a Program To Augment the Population of Humpback Chub (Gila cypha) In Grand Canyon.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Flagstaff, AZ.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Feasibility of Establishing a Supplemental Stocking Program Using Wild Caught <br />Age-O Fish <br /> <br />Objective and rationale <br /> <br />Below, we investigate the feasibility of capturing wild age-O humpback chub from the <br />LCR, transporting them to a grow-out facility, marking them with a unique identifier <br />(such as a Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT] tag), and releasing them back into the <br />Colorado River or its tributaries within Grand Canyon. Part of the rationale for <br />investigating this approach is that this method is currently being used as a management <br />action to conserve the razorback sucker population in Lake Mohave. <br /> <br />Since augmentation of a population via the use of brood stock progeny is genetically <br />risky, this document incorporates the concept of capture and grow out of wild age-O fish, <br />and releasing them at larger sizes to augment the population of humpback chub in <br />Grand Canyon. Many of the potential problems associated with inbreeding and <br />reduction of Ne in the wild population should be avoided since there is no captive <br />breeding of offspring. In addition, this method is expected to be more cost effective. <br /> <br />Unfortunately, there appears to be a lack of literature concerning the capture, short-term <br />grow-out, and release of wild progeny. Dowling et al. (1996) discussed direct capture <br />and grow out of larvae in order to augment the population of razorback sucker <br />(Xyrauchen texanus) in Lake Mohave. This approach, rather than supportive stocking <br />via standard hatchery broodstock procedures, was suggested by Dowling et al. (1996) <br />in order to maximize genetic variation. The assumption is that collection of wild larvae <br />in a temporally and geographically spaced design will result in maximization of parental <br />representation, and maximum genetic variability should be retained. Such an approach <br />has been ongoing on Lake Mohave since 1993, and in 1999 repatriates from this <br />program constituted approximately 12% of the adult population (Minckley et al. 2003). <br />Hence, the decline that has been occurring in the Lake Mohave razorback population <br />may be showing progress toward the goal of establishing a stock of no fewer than <br />50,000 repatriated fish (P. Marsh, ASU, pers. com.). <br /> <br />The main purpose for establishing a program for the capture and grow-out of age-O <br />humpback chub is to potentially increase the likelihood for survivorship to a larger size <br />class (e.g., > 150 mm). Based on modeling, it is believed that recruitment failure is the <br />main factor causing decline in the humpback chub population of Grand Canyon (C. <br />Walters, Univ. British Columbia [UBC], pers. com.). Recruitment failure is thought to be <br />caused by a myriad of factors, including mainstem Colorado River habitat degradation, <br />predation (Minckley 1991, Valdez and Ryel 1995, Clarkson and Childs 2000), or <br />parasites such as the Asian tapeworm (Clarkson et al. 1997). One of the main reasons <br />that age-O and juvenile humpback chub appear to suffer high mortality in the mainstem <br />is that once displaced into the mainstem, they lack growth and remain vulnerable to the <br />effects of predation for a long period of time (Clarkson and Childs 2000). <br /> <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.