Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Endangered Fish Survey <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />When asked if they could name the four endangered fish species without being prompted, <br />about a third or less were able to name any of the fish (Figure 6), Thirty-six percent identified <br />the Colorado squawfish, about a fifth mentioned the humpback chub, and less than 15% named <br />either the razorback sucker or bonytail chub, <br /> <br />Figure 6. Listed endangered fish unprompted <br /> <br />% Correct <br /> <br />1 00010 <br /> <br />80% <br /> <br />60% <br /> <br />36% <br /> <br />40% <br /> <br /> <br />9% <br /> <br />20% <br /> <br />:~~tl~l~~~~~~ft,l~t: <br /> <br />0% <br /> <br />Colorado <br />Squawfish <br /> <br />Razorback Humpback Bonytail <br />Sucker Chub Chub <br /> <br />Consistent with the previous findings, the elected officials were most likely to list the four <br />endangered fish, followed by the anglers, and the environmental group members (Figure 7), <br />The general public was again least able to specify the names of the four fish, <br /> <br />Figure 7. Listed endangered fish unprompted by group <br /> <br />100% <br /> <br />% Correct <br /> <br />DElected Officials lllGeneral Public <br />DAnglers -Environmental Groups <br /> <br />75% <br /> <br />52% <br /> <br />50% <br /> <br /> <br />25% <br /> <br />0% <br /> <br />Colorado <br />Squawfish <br /> <br />Razorback Humpback <br />Sucker Chub <br /> <br />Bonytail <br />Chub <br />