Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1.1 Objectives <br /> <br />The objectives of this investigation are to: <br /> <br />1. Determine the extent and change in use of the Dolores River by native Colorado <br />River fishes with the advent of consistent flows, reduced pollutant inflow, and <br />reduced salinity now occurring in the Dolores River.Basin. <br /> <br />2. Assess suitability of chemical, physical and biological attributes of the Dolores River <br />for native and endangered Colorado River fishes. <br /> <br />3. Evaluate the feasibility of reintroducing Colorado squawfish into the Dolores River <br />to enhance recovery of the species in the upper basin. <br /> <br />4. Issue recommendations on reintroducing the Colorado squawfish into the Dolores <br />River. <br /> <br />1.2 Background <br /> <br />The Dolores River once supported unknown numbers of Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius) <br />and perhaps functioned as a spawning tnoutary for this species in the upper Colorado River. <br />Seethaler (1978) reported that T.M. Lynch seined small squawfish from Paradox Valley in 1962. <br />Several other collections of Colorado squawfish were reported during the 1950's and 1960's by <br />Lemons (1955), Nolting (1956), and Coon (1965). The most recent collection of Colorado squawfish <br />in the Dolores drainage was by Horpestad in 1973, who reported the capture of seven individuals in <br />the San Miguel River, approximately 6 miles above it's confluence with the Dolores River (Horpestad <br />1973). However, no Colorado squawfish were captured during a fishery survey of the Dolores River <br />by Holden and Stalnaker (1975) during 1971. More recent surveys by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br />Service (USFWS) in the early 1980's also failed to locate Colorado squawfish in the Dolores River <br />(Valdez et aI. 1982). <br /> <br />Uranium processing facilities operated during the late 1940's through the 1960's caused severe <br />impacts to the stream biota and may have contributed greatly to the local demise of the Colorado <br />squawfish in the Dolores drainage (Sigler et at 1966). These uranium processing facilities include <br />a uranium concentrator at Naturita, Colorado and a large uranium mill at Uravan, Colorado, both <br />of which are located on the San Miguel River within 15 miles of its confluence with the Dolores <br />River. A uranium concentrator plant is also located on the Dolores River near the town of Slickrock, <br />Colorado, approximately 60 miles above the confluence of the Dolores and San Miguel Rivers. <br /> <br />Direct observations of stream impacts associated with effluent and "accidental" spills of uranium mill <br />wastes from the Uravan mill site on the lower San Miguel River were made by Sigler et al. (1966), <br />and included fish kills, fish avoidance movements and dramatic pH swings (7.6 to 4.3). <br /> <br />A recent court order under the EP A Superfund Program to remove mill tailings at the Uravan mill <br />site may significantly improve water quality in the Dolores River. Clean up operations as a result of <br />this court order are currently in progress at the Uravan site. Removal of mill tailings and stabilization <br />of riverside ponds are scheduled to be completed in phases within the next 2 to 6 years. Informal <br />site visits were made during each field trip by BIO/WEST in 1990, to observe progress of clean up <br /> <br />2 <br />