|
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />UST OF FIGURES
<br />
<br />Figure 1. Study area for Dolores River Native Fish Habitat Suitability Study, 1990-
<br />
<br />1991 ,.....,.............,.....,.,.....,.......,...,.........". 93
<br />
<br />Figure 2. Locations of water quality and invertebrate sampling sites for Dolores River
<br />Native Fish Habitat Suitability Study, 1990-1991 .....,...,......,..,...... 94
<br />Figure 3, Composition of native ftsh species captured by netting and electrofishing in six
<br />reaches of the Dolores River by BIO/WEST, 1990-1991 ........."......... 95
<br />Figure 4. Composition of flannelmouth sucker captured by netting and electrofishing in
<br />six reaches of the Dolores River by BIO/WEST, 1990-1991 , . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . .. %
<br />Figure 5. Composition of bluehead sucker captured by netting and electrofishing in six
<br />reaches of the Dolores River by BIO/WEST, 1990-1991 ..,.,...,..."..".. 97
<br />Figure 6. Composition of round tail chub captured by netting and electrofishing in six
<br />reaches of the Dolores River by BIO/WEST, 1990-1991 ..,................. 98
<br />Figure 7. Composition of speckled dace captured by netting and electrofishing in six
<br />reaches of the Dolores River by BIO/WEST, 1990-1991 ...,......,.......,. 99
<br />Figure 8. Composition of native species captured by seining in six reaches of the
<br />Dolores River by BIO/WEST, 1990-1991 .".."........".."...,...,. 100
<br />Figure 9. Comparison of flows above and below McPhee Reservoir. Flows above
<br />McPhee from USGS gage at Dolores, flows below McPhee from USGS gage
<br />at Bedrock. Post dam data(March 1984 to September 1991) used to calculate
<br />mean monthly flows are provisional. , , , . . . , , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . ., 101
<br />Figure 10. Daily discharge for the Dolores River during the study period (October 89-
<br />September 91) compared to mean monthly flows. Data from USGS gage near
<br />
<br />Cisco ........,....,.........,...........,..."..".......,.." 102
<br />
<br />Figure 11. Mean monthly flow comparison for the Dolores (USGS gage near Cisco)
<br />White (USGS gage near Watson), and Yampa (USGS gage at Deerlodge)
<br />rivers. Dolores River flows are postdam, March 1984 to December 1990 . . , . . ,. 103
<br />Figure 12. Mean monthly temperatures - Dolores River (USGS gage near Cisco) vs.
<br />Colorado River (USGS gage near Cisco). Dolores River temps are postdam -
<br />March 1984 to December 1990 .,.",......,....,............,...,.. 104
<br />Figure 13. Detailed map of potential spawning area at RM 30.8 on the Dolores River, 1990-
<br />1991. Refer to Appendix A for speciftc transect data. . . , . . . , . . . . , . . , . . . .. 105
<br />Figure 14. Detailed map of potential spawning area at RM 49.5 on the Dolores River, 1990-
<br />1991. Refer to Appendix A for specific transect data. , . , . , . . . , . . . , . . . , . .. 106
<br />Figure 15. Detailed map of potential spawning area at RM 53,7 on the Dolores River, 1990-
<br />1991. Refer to Appendix A for specific transect data .. . . , . . , . , . . . . . . , . . .. 107
<br />
<br />VII
<br />
|