My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7046 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7046 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:16:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7046
Author
Valdez, R. A., W. J. Masslich and A. Wasowicz.
Title
Final Report\
USFW Year
1992.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />10 <br /> <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />presented as a means of indicating possible changes that have occurred in the Dolores River in the <br />last 9-10 years. Based on differences in catch rates and species composition between BIO/WEST's <br />1990 and 1991 data, the potential for a high variability in catch data is apparent. Differences between <br />the two studies were expected especially with differences in gear types, efficiency and methods. Since <br />these differences could not be evaluated, comparisons between catch data from the two studies <br />focused on gross differences in composition and catch rates. <br /> <br />Catch rates for netting and electrofishing combined (Table 29) showed little differences between <br />the two studies. No unusual discrepancies or patterns were identified between the two data sets. <br />Catch rates for seining also showed no major differences between the two studies (Table 30). One <br />minor difference was the high catch rates for red shiners and roundtail chubs by the Service in April <br />followed by a decline in July. BIO/WEST's data suggests an opposite pattern, low catch rates in April <br />followed by higher catch rates in July as individuals from the current year class became prominent <br />in the catch. Differences may have reflected a poor year class of these two species during the <br />Service's study in 1981. <br /> <br />No major changes in fish species composition captured in gill nets, trammel nets and by <br />electrofishing were evident between the two studies (Table 31). Several trends were noteworthy and <br />suggested subtle changes in species composition. Except for Reach 1, consistently lower catch rates <br />of round tail chub by BIO/WEST suggest a decrease in abundance of this species. Conversely, <br />consistently higher catch rates of flannelmouth suckers in all reaches except Reach 1 indicate an <br />increased abundance of this species, particularly higher in the drainage. <br /> <br />With the exception of compositional shifts between sand shiners, red shiners and fathead <br />minnows, seining data showed very few changes in species composition of fish captured seining since <br />1981 (Table 32). The shift in composition between red shiners, sand shiners and fathead minnows <br />probably represents natural variation in populations of these prolific species. <br /> <br />4.3 Summary of Colorado Squawfish Habitat Assessment <br /> <br />Habitat suitability assessment of the Dolores River for Colorado squawfish was divided into three <br />components including: 1) physical attributes; 2) chemical attributes, and 3) biological attributes. Each <br />of these components is address in the following sections. <br /> <br />4.3.1 Physical Attributes <br /> <br />Habitat suitability of the Dolores River was influenced by physical attributes such as flow, <br />temperature, substrate characteristics, habitat structure, and channel morphology. Measuring these <br />physical attributes was generally not difficult, but determining the combination of attnbutes most <br />suitable to a species like the Colorado squawfish is not well defined, particularly since the fish cannot <br />be observed directly. For the purposes of this study, it was necessary to use information collected <br />on physical habitat for Colorado squawfish from other upper basin rivers. We assumed that physical <br />habitat of the Dolores River was suitable and not limiting if its physical attributes were within the <br />range in areas of other rivers used by the species. <br /> <br />Criteria for physical habitat suitability were based on HSI curves developed by Valdez et ale <br />(1987), for endangered fish of the Upper Colorado River Basin. These HSI curves were developed <br />using data collected on various life stages of Colorado squawfish between 1964 and 1985. Studies of <br />Colorado squawfish in other upper basin drainages were also used. Information collected from the <br />Yampa and White rivers was used to describe habitat requirements, since these systems may be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.