Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Gill and trammel net catch rates by species by trip for the 2 years of study show no definitive <br />patterns of fish abundance between trips (Tables 13 and 14). These data reflect lower efforts during <br />1991. <br /> <br />Netting was not conducted in Reach 6 by BIO/WEST. Electrofishing was the primary sampling <br />method in this reach. Netting was conducted in Reach 6 by CDOW during 1987-1990. CDOW catch <br />rates reported for Reach 6 (RM 129-185) were highest for roundtail chub (7.1 fish/1oo feet of <br />net/overnight set), followed by tlannelmouth sucker (3.9), trout species (1.8) bluehead sucker (1.0) <br />and channel catfish (0.2). These results were comparable to species composition found by <br />BIO/WEST in Reach 6 (Table 34), indicating that roundtail chub and tlannelmouth sucker were the <br />most abundant species in Reach 6. <br /> <br />4.2.3 Seining <br /> <br />Red shiner (98.1 fish/100 m2), sand shiner (69.6) and fathead minnow (54.0) dominated catch rates <br />when data for all 10 habitat types were combined (Table 15). Catch rates for native species, were <br />9.2 for roundtail chub, 8.2 for flannelmouth sucker, 6.7 for speckled dace and 2:2 for blue head sucker. <br />Channel catfish and unidentified suckers represented the only other species with relatively high catch <br />rates of 2.4 and 1.8, respectively. Limited use of a large seine resulted in the capture of three <br />species, all non-natives (Table 16). <br /> <br />Catch rates for red shiners, sand shiners and fathead minnow correspondingly dominated catch <br />rates in eight of ten habitat types (Tables 17-26). Two habitat types not dominated by this species <br />assemblage were rimes and isolated pools. Speckled dace dominated seining catch rates in rimes <br />(14.1 fish/1oo m2) followed by channel catfish (13.5) and red shiners (9.5) (Table 24). In isolated <br />pools, red shiners were most abundant (51.7 fish/100 m2) followed by roundtail chub (13.0), and <br />fathead minnows (12.6) (Table 26). <br /> <br />Seining was the most consistent fish. sampling technique between reaches. Although sampling <br />effort was not always consistent between trips or reaches, factors affecting seining catch rates were <br />not as variable as with other sampling techniques. Still, seining catch rates varied substantially <br />between the 2 years of study (Table 27). Catch rates were much higher in 1990 than 1991 with the <br />exception of the first trip (pre-runoff). It is hypothesized that low flows during 1990 created <br />conditions more conducive to seining and may have concentrated fish and increased catch rates. <br />However, higher catch rates in Trip 1 of 1991 compared to Trip 1 of 1990, indicated high spawning <br />success of most species with a strong cohort the following spring. <br /> <br />Of the 14 species captured by seining, five were from backwaters, three from rimes, three from <br />isolated pools, two from embayments and one each from trickle-fed backwaters, eddies and pools <br />(Table 28). The three native species, flannelmouth sucker, bluehead sucker and roundtail chub, were <br />in backwaters. The affinity of these species for backwaters was shared by red shiners and fathead <br />minnows. Speckled dace was the only native species captured most frequently in rimes, although <br />catch rates were also relatively high in backwaters. <br /> <br />4.2.4 Fish Species Composition - Past and Present <br /> <br />In order to address Objective 1 of this study, a comparison was made between the 1981 study <br />(Valdezet al.1982) and the 1990-1991 BIO/WESTinvestigation. Comparisons of catch rates for trips <br />conducted within the same season of the year are presented in Tables 29 and 30. Species composition <br />by reach was compared between the two studies in Tables 31 and 32. These comparisons are <br /> <br />9 <br />