My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7046 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7046 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:16:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7046
Author
Valdez, R. A., W. J. Masslich and A. Wasowicz.
Title
Final Report\
USFW Year
1992.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Gill and trammel net catch rates by species by trip for the 2 years of study show no definitive <br />patterns of fish abundance between trips (Tables 13 and 14). These data reflect lower efforts during <br />1991. <br /> <br />Netting was not conducted in Reach 6 by BIO/WEST. Electrofishing was the primary sampling <br />method in this reach. Netting was conducted in Reach 6 by CDOW during 1987-1990. CDOW catch <br />rates reported for Reach 6 (RM 129-185) were highest for roundtail chub (7.1 fish/1oo feet of <br />net/overnight set), followed by tlannelmouth sucker (3.9), trout species (1.8) bluehead sucker (1.0) <br />and channel catfish (0.2). These results were comparable to species composition found by <br />BIO/WEST in Reach 6 (Table 34), indicating that roundtail chub and tlannelmouth sucker were the <br />most abundant species in Reach 6. <br /> <br />4.2.3 Seining <br /> <br />Red shiner (98.1 fish/100 m2), sand shiner (69.6) and fathead minnow (54.0) dominated catch rates <br />when data for all 10 habitat types were combined (Table 15). Catch rates for native species, were <br />9.2 for roundtail chub, 8.2 for flannelmouth sucker, 6.7 for speckled dace and 2:2 for blue head sucker. <br />Channel catfish and unidentified suckers represented the only other species with relatively high catch <br />rates of 2.4 and 1.8, respectively. Limited use of a large seine resulted in the capture of three <br />species, all non-natives (Table 16). <br /> <br />Catch rates for red shiners, sand shiners and fathead minnow correspondingly dominated catch <br />rates in eight of ten habitat types (Tables 17-26). Two habitat types not dominated by this species <br />assemblage were rimes and isolated pools. Speckled dace dominated seining catch rates in rimes <br />(14.1 fish/1oo m2) followed by channel catfish (13.5) and red shiners (9.5) (Table 24). In isolated <br />pools, red shiners were most abundant (51.7 fish/100 m2) followed by roundtail chub (13.0), and <br />fathead minnows (12.6) (Table 26). <br /> <br />Seining was the most consistent fish. sampling technique between reaches. Although sampling <br />effort was not always consistent between trips or reaches, factors affecting seining catch rates were <br />not as variable as with other sampling techniques. Still, seining catch rates varied substantially <br />between the 2 years of study (Table 27). Catch rates were much higher in 1990 than 1991 with the <br />exception of the first trip (pre-runoff). It is hypothesized that low flows during 1990 created <br />conditions more conducive to seining and may have concentrated fish and increased catch rates. <br />However, higher catch rates in Trip 1 of 1991 compared to Trip 1 of 1990, indicated high spawning <br />success of most species with a strong cohort the following spring. <br /> <br />Of the 14 species captured by seining, five were from backwaters, three from rimes, three from <br />isolated pools, two from embayments and one each from trickle-fed backwaters, eddies and pools <br />(Table 28). The three native species, flannelmouth sucker, bluehead sucker and roundtail chub, were <br />in backwaters. The affinity of these species for backwaters was shared by red shiners and fathead <br />minnows. Speckled dace was the only native species captured most frequently in rimes, although <br />catch rates were also relatively high in backwaters. <br /> <br />4.2.4 Fish Species Composition - Past and Present <br /> <br />In order to address Objective 1 of this study, a comparison was made between the 1981 study <br />(Valdezet al.1982) and the 1990-1991 BIO/WESTinvestigation. Comparisons of catch rates for trips <br />conducted within the same season of the year are presented in Tables 29 and 30. Species composition <br />by reach was compared between the two studies in Tables 31 and 32. These comparisons are <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.