My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8025
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:15:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8025
Author
Valdez, R., et al.
Title
Colorado River Fishery Project, Tributary Report (Gunnison and Dolores River) Final Report.
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7 <br /> <br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Physical and Chemical Descriptions <br /> <br />The Gunnison and Dolores rivers differed in several physical and <br />chemical characteristics. Generally, the Gunnison River had greater <br />channel width, higher flow rates, fewer rapids and more floodplain area <br />than the Dolores River. Gunnison River flows ranged from 850 to 13,200 <br />cfs at Whitewater from 1979 through 1980 (Figure 2 and 3). Flows on the <br />Dolores River varied from 50 to 1890 cfs at the San Miguel confluence in <br />1981 (Figure 4). The 1981 flows were quite different from those of the <br />previous 2 years (Figures 5 and 6). Large silt deposits were observed in <br />both rivers, in backwaters and other habitats characterized by low <br />velocities. <br /> <br />Conductivity and salinity values were generally lower in the Gun- <br />nison River than in the Dolores River. Several salt mining operations <br />and salt settling ponds are located on the Dolores River, which probably <br />contributed to higher conductivity and salinity. Conductivity and <br />salinity values dropped during the runoff period in both rivers, presum- <br />ably due to the diluting effect of snowmelt. Dissolved oxygen concen- <br />tration and turbidity was nearly the same in both rivers during respec- <br />tive flow periods. <br /> <br />River temperatures were also similar for the Gunnison and Dolores <br />rivers~ The river temperatures ranged from l3.SoC (5 May 1981) to 280C <br />(17 June 1981) in the Gunnison River and 13.40C (12 May 1981) to 260C <br />(10 June 1981) ~n the Dolores River. <br /> <br />Gunnison River <br /> <br />Stratum Q: Colorado-Gunnison River confluence to Whitewater. <br />The lower 3 miles of this stratum is drastically altered due to the <br />effects of the Redlands Diversion. A large deep pool is located below <br />the spillway (RM 3.0) before the river becomes shallower downstream. <br />Little or no flow was observed below the structure in late summer because <br />nearly all water is diverted through Redlands Canal, and irrigation <br />returns bypass this lower Gunnison reach and flow directly into the Colo- <br />rado River. The upper section of stratum Q has wide floodplains, few <br />riffles and rapids, and several gravel pits and quarries along the river <br />corridor. A long deep pool is formed directly above Redlands Diversion <br />where water is impounded by the structure. Maximum depths reach approxi- <br />mately 30 ft (near the dam) with a mean stratum depth of approximately <br />6.6 ft. The width of the river varied from 260 to 525 ft in this <br />stratum. <br /> <br />Conductivity ranged from 1000 to 1600 <br />values were 0-1 parts per thousand (ppth). <br />trations were generally 9 to 10 mg/l. The <br />stratum during the study. <br /> <br />umhos cm-l while salinity <br />Dissolved oxygen concen- <br />river was turbid in this <br /> <br />Stratum R: Whitewater to Bridgeport. In the upper portion of <br />stratum R, the river flows through canyon topography, and the lower 2.2 <br />miles has larger floodplain areas with gradually ~loping banks. This <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.