My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8025
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:15:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8025
Author
Valdez, R., et al.
Title
Colorado River Fishery Project, Tributary Report (Gunnison and Dolores River) Final Report.
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />6 <br /> <br />Other Species <br /> <br />Fishes collected during regular sampling were processed soon after <br />capture. Total lengths, weights and Lernaea sp. counts were recorded for <br />each fish collected from all gears except seining. Fish collected from <br />seine hauls were identified, tabulated, checked for Lernaea sp. and <br />released. Flay tags (red) were attached at the base of the dorsal fin of <br />fish 250 mm or longer. <br /> <br />Habitat Parameters <br /> <br />Depth, current velocity and substrate data were recorded with each <br />capture of a target fish. Depth was measured with a Philadelphia rod or <br />a Lowrance Model LRG 1510-A sonar depth finder. Current velocities were <br />obtained using a Marsh-McBirney Model 201 current meter. The meter <br />sensor was placed on a Philadelphia rod and velocities were read at a <br />point approximately 0.6 of the distance from the water surface to the <br />river bottom, at the site where an endangered fish was captured. Primary <br />and secondary substrate at capture sites were recorded (Appendix A). <br /> <br />Analyses <br /> <br />The Gunnison and Dolores rivers were divided into three and four <br />homogenous strata, respectively, to provide spatial comparisons for total <br />fish species and numbers. Species composition and catch per unit effort <br />(CPE) were compared between strata, habitats and flow periods. CPE was <br />divided into two groups, those quantified by time and area. Catches <br />using electrofishing. trammel nets, gill nets and fyke nets were combined <br />to yield CPE for hour- related gears. CPE values for hour gears pertain <br />more to larger fish (>100 rom) because the gear types used were selective <br />for larger fish. Catches from all seines (1/8, 114 and l/2-in. mesh) <br />were combined to yield the area CPE. The area CPE values (because of <br />gear selectivity) reflect catch for smaller fishes. CPE was calculated <br />for each species captured with area and hour-based gears. Use of the two <br />CPE combinations for comparative purposes is justified because similar <br />field routines were employed during each sampling trip. <br /> <br />Data were stored and recovered in a computer sytem called MANAGE <br />(Valdez and Wilcott 1980). Three datasets, PHYSICAL. CATCH and RARE, <br />contain all data collected from the Gunnison and Dolores rivers. Each <br />data set has 21, 20 and 29 searchable fields. respectively. The PHYSICAL <br />dataset has all data pertaining to water chemistry ~nd physical <br />characteristics of the two rivers. The CATCH dataset contains data on <br />all fish species from each specific sample taken, and RARE has data from <br />endangered fishes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.