My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9298
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9298
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:13:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9298
Author
Water Education Foundation.
Title
Colorado River Project
USFW Year
1999.
USFW - Doc Type
Symposium Proceedings.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />But having instream <br />flow rights that cross an <br />international boundary, <br /> <br /> <br />THE <br />BALANCI NG <br />ACT <br /> <br />SYMPOSIUM <br />PROCEEDINGS <br />SEPTEMBER 1999 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />to the federal government? Yes. Will this require a <br />treaty amendment, i.e., ecological minute, with <br />Mexico? Again, I think the answer there is, yes. I <br />think a treaty amendment with Mexico will occur, <br />but I think it will occur as a result of the fact that all <br />the stakeholders and all of the various parties - I <br />don't mean just the United States government and the <br />Mexican government - will show a commitment to <br />restore the Delta and to have the Gulf of California, <br />specifically the northern reach, be healthy. So I don't <br />think the treaty amendment will come down and <br />evetyone will scramble to comply with that. I think <br />the treaty amendment will sort of confirm and ratify <br />a series of agreements and understandings that will <br />occur. <br />Certainly we need to preserve the Wellton- <br />Mohawk flow into the Santa Clara Slough. I'll talk <br />more about that this afternoon. I think the whole <br />concept of surplus criteria must have an ecological <br />component. There <br />must be ecological <br />cri teria to the <br />concept of <br />surplus. The <br />Salton Sea is a <br />massive question <br />mark and head- <br />ache, certainly <br />with regard to the <br />Gulf and the <br />Delta. <br />What this all <br />leads to, and it <br />sort of comes full <br />circle with regard <br />to what the treaty <br />amendment with <br />Mexico would look like, is that ultimately what we're <br />talking about is instream flow rights, international <br />instream flow rights. There are maybe some examples <br />in the Middle East. There are some examples maybe <br />in Africa. But this is uncharted legal territory and <br />that's where the challenge will be. We have instream <br />flow rights in most states throughout the West. But <br />having instream flow rights that cross an international <br />boundary, that's a new ball game. <br /> <br />We have instream flow <br /> <br /> <br />rights in most states <br /> <br />throughout the West. <br /> <br />that's a new ball game. <br /> <br />- Bill Snape <br /> <br />SWAN: You have a new report out, don't you, Bill, <br />on this? <br /> <br />SNAPE: Actually, the Environmental Defense Fund, <br />Carlos Valdez, who is in the audience, and Ed Glenn, <br />who will be here this afternoon, just published a <br />report. We'll talk about this more, but they showed <br /> <br />that restoring the Delta and having flows reach the <br />Gulf of California may not be as onerous as we might <br />think. Restoration is quite achievable and would nor <br />cause much pain at all to existing water uses. <br /> <br />RINNE: One of the things that I am still not sure of <br />and that I think is probably one of the issues we must <br />address in the Delta is how much water is needed <br />there on a short term or periodic basis to sustain <br />habitat. I don'r think that's well defined yet. I think <br />that's a data gap that we have to do more work on <br />with Mexico to understand the need and how to use <br />its share of the water. <br />The solution probably comes with how Mexico <br />wants to manage that part of the Delta and it <br />probably comes from some combination of ag flows, <br />groundwater and maybe taking advantage of flood <br />flows. It's a good first step but the study is just a one <br />time snapshot that says, "We observed flows and it <br />took this much and it went to the Delta." I think the <br />scientific end of it needs more investigation. <br />No doubt in my mind either that the Delta is a <br />very important and emerging issue stated well by <br />some of the panel members yesterday. It will take <br />international and local support. There's not a single <br />group that can pull that off. <br /> <br />SWAN: Do you foresee the need for a treaty? <br /> <br />RINNE: I thought about the treaty. I suspect that <br />something pursuant to the treaty might have to be <br />done if coordination and collaboration aren't enough. <br />Whether it's a treaty amendment or a minute, I don't <br />know. I think there's agreement that some kind of a <br />bi-national agreement would have to be worked on. <br />And there are efforts underway now, at least some <br />discussions, to see what we can do. I really don't <br />know whether it gets to impacting the treaty. <br /> <br />HYDE: I want to make two quick points. One is <br />that scientific evidence is pointing to the fact that the <br />Delta was probably the most important ecological <br />component of the Colorado River system. It was <br />potentially, in pre-dam times, the area from which <br />the whole Colorado River system was recolonized by <br />species after the high disturbance elements of the <br />system wiped out certain areas of the Colorado River. <br />So it is critically important from an ecological <br />perspective that the Delta issue doesn't get swept <br />under the carpet. <br />The second point I would make is, if we did not <br />store two years worth of river flow in Lake Powell <br />reservoir, we would have somewhere along the lines <br />of 800,000 to 1 million acre-feet of additional water <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.