My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9390
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9390
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:12:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9390
Author
Webb, R. H., T. S. Melis and R. A. Valdez.
Title
Observations of Environmental Change in Grand Canyon, Arizona.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
02-4080,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.. <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 4. Deer Creek Falls (mile 136.1-R) (continued). <br /> <br /> <br />C (left). July 1, 1972. Because of flood control operations of Glen Canyon Dam, riparian vegetation has increased <br />along the river. This lush growth of native and non-native species is typical of conditions in 1972 in Grand Canyon <br />(Matches A, Raymond M. Turner, Stake 692). <br /> <br />D (right). November 3,2001. A flood in the summer of 2001 stripped much of the riparian vegetation out of the <br />mouth of Deer Creek. In the 1980s and 1990s, floods of this magnitude have occurred every 2-4 years. Again, the <br />rocks have been removed from the debris fan and cobbles cover its surface. Debris fans are aggrading throughout <br />Grand Canyon, and the fan at the mouth of Deer Creek is no exception (Matches B, Tom Brownold, Stake 2985). <br /> <br />One of the most perceptive observations carne <br />from Reilly. He mentioned changes caused by the 1955 <br />debris flow at Lava Falls, such as fewer holes and <br />smoothing of the rapid as the spaces behind the large <br />boulders were filled with smaller ones. Sediment <br />eroded from the fan filled in much of the eddy <br />downstream to the Warm Springs, making the lining <br />operation easier. <br /> <br />Sand Bars <br /> <br />Our work with repeat photography, particularly <br />with the Stanton photography of 1889-1890, suggests <br />that sand-bar erosion was severe and decreases with <br />distance downstream from Glen Canyon Darn (Schmidt <br />and Graf, 1990; Schmidt and others, 1995; Webb, <br />1996). We wanted the Old Timers' opinion on that <br />conclusion. Most of the Old Timers lamented the <br />current status of sand bars in Grand Canyon, <br />particularly in Marble Canyon (miles 0 to 61); they <br />often pointed to sand bars and noted how small they <br /> <br />SPECIFIC CHANGES OBSERVED IN GRAND CANYON 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.