My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7332
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7332
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:11:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7332
Author
Valdez, R. A., et al.
Title
Final Report Habitat Suitability Index Curves for Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1987.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />The Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) is using the Instream Flow Incremental <br />Methodology (IFIM) as a tool for evaluating the habi tat requi rements of the <br />endangered fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB). IFIM is a modular <br />system designed to simulate habitat as a function of streamflow (Bovee 1982; <br />Milhous et al. 1984). Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) curves, which are an <br />integral component of IFIM, are graphic representations of relative preferences <br />or tolerances for variables (depth, velocity, substrate, cover, and temper- <br />ature) that are important to the well-being of a species. Several techniques <br />are available for developing HSI curves (Bovee 1986); the method utilized often <br />depends on the quantity and quality of data available. <br /> <br />Data have bee~ collected for several years to determine the habitat needs <br />of the Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius), humpback chub (Gila cypha), <br />and razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) in the UCRB. Data from 1979-1984 were <br />used by FWS to develop HSlcurves in 1984 (U.S. Fish and wildlife Service <br />1984). There was some concern, however, that earlier data and data from other <br />agencies and organizations were not included in the analysis (on],y FWS data <br />were used), and that development of the curves was not well documented (Valdez <br />1985a) . Also, there was not general agreement concerning data analysis and <br />curve development techniques used by FWS in the 1984 exercise. <br /> <br />The purpose of this HSI CUrve Development Project was to assimilate all of <br />the data available from UCRB studies for the three target fishes, including <br />data collected by FWS as well as by State and Federal agencies and private <br />groups, and develop HSI curves that represent habitat used by these endangered <br />fishes. The project was designed to integrate and analyze all data; develop <br />HSI curves for all variables, life stages, and species; identify data gaps and <br />needs; and to evaluate the data and reach agreement by species experts on the <br />best possible curve sets, given the present knowledge. A consensus by species <br />experts was required to determine which data were suitable for analysis, how <br />curves were to be developed, and when and where these curves are applicable. <br /> <br />PROJECT OBJECTIVES <br /> <br />The goal of this project was to generate the best possible HSI curves or <br />criteria for depth, velocity, substrate, cover, and temperature, using the <br />existing data and the professional judgement of species experts, for all life <br />stages of the Colorado squawfish, humpback chub, and razorback sucker. The <br />bony tail chub (Gila elegans) was excluded from this analysis because of <br />insufficient information on the habitat and life history of this species. To <br />accomplish this goal, the following objectives were met: <br /> <br />1. Based on judgement of experts, determine which data within the <br />computerized database are suitable for quantitative analysis and use <br />in HSI curve development, versus those which are only useful for <br />substantiating use of certain habitat variables and types. <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.