Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />The Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) is using the Instream Flow Incremental <br />Methodology (IFIM) as a tool for evaluating the habi tat requi rements of the <br />endangered fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB). IFIM is a modular <br />system designed to simulate habitat as a function of streamflow (Bovee 1982; <br />Milhous et al. 1984). Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) curves, which are an <br />integral component of IFIM, are graphic representations of relative preferences <br />or tolerances for variables (depth, velocity, substrate, cover, and temper- <br />ature) that are important to the well-being of a species. Several techniques <br />are available for developing HSI curves (Bovee 1986); the method utilized often <br />depends on the quantity and quality of data available. <br /> <br />Data have bee~ collected for several years to determine the habitat needs <br />of the Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius), humpback chub (Gila cypha), <br />and razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) in the UCRB. Data from 1979-1984 were <br />used by FWS to develop HSlcurves in 1984 (U.S. Fish and wildlife Service <br />1984). There was some concern, however, that earlier data and data from other <br />agencies and organizations were not included in the analysis (on],y FWS data <br />were used), and that development of the curves was not well documented (Valdez <br />1985a) . Also, there was not general agreement concerning data analysis and <br />curve development techniques used by FWS in the 1984 exercise. <br /> <br />The purpose of this HSI CUrve Development Project was to assimilate all of <br />the data available from UCRB studies for the three target fishes, including <br />data collected by FWS as well as by State and Federal agencies and private <br />groups, and develop HSI curves that represent habitat used by these endangered <br />fishes. The project was designed to integrate and analyze all data; develop <br />HSI curves for all variables, life stages, and species; identify data gaps and <br />needs; and to evaluate the data and reach agreement by species experts on the <br />best possible curve sets, given the present knowledge. A consensus by species <br />experts was required to determine which data were suitable for analysis, how <br />curves were to be developed, and when and where these curves are applicable. <br /> <br />PROJECT OBJECTIVES <br /> <br />The goal of this project was to generate the best possible HSI curves or <br />criteria for depth, velocity, substrate, cover, and temperature, using the <br />existing data and the professional judgement of species experts, for all life <br />stages of the Colorado squawfish, humpback chub, and razorback sucker. The <br />bony tail chub (Gila elegans) was excluded from this analysis because of <br />insufficient information on the habitat and life history of this species. To <br />accomplish this goal, the following objectives were met: <br /> <br />1. Based on judgement of experts, determine which data within the <br />computerized database are suitable for quantitative analysis and use <br />in HSI curve development, versus those which are only useful for <br />substantiating use of certain habitat variables and types. <br /> <br />1 <br />