My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8109
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8109
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:08:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8109
Author
Mitchell, M. J.
Title
Impact of the Proceedures for Stocking Non Native Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin on Private Landowners and the Commercial Aquaculture Industry
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
Inventory of Public and Private Ponds Along the Upper Colorado and Lower Gunnison Rivers in Colorado-Draft.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />• Implementation of the procedures and a landowner incentive program will create demand <br />for additional fishery consulting ,design, planning, reclamation, and product services. <br />Private sector fisheries service businesses can benefit from the increased demand if the <br />program is designed to utilize private sector professionals only. <br />Industry Development Impacts: <br />• The procedures impact the development of private aquaculture facilities within the 6504 <br />msl zone by requiring an additional time consuming review process for virtually all <br />nonsalmonid fish species. Furthermore, this review process for aquaculture facility use of <br />nonnative warmwater species is not defined and is not adequately addressed through the <br />proposed "AFS policy". <br />• Table 1 appears to eliminate the ability of wastewater treatment plants to use fathead <br />minnows for bioassay if they are located within the 50 year floodplain without individual <br />proposal and case by case review. This will increase wastewater treatment costs. <br />Policy mitigation recommendations for the commercial aquaculture industry <br />• <br />• <br />• Develop and fund a full time equivalent position within Colorado State Government to <br />provide permit review, case by case review, and stocking request responses for fish <br />stocking and aquaculture development activities. This position should have duties <br />prioritized to allow the private sector the necessary amount of time to afford compliance. <br />• Identify, fund, and facilitate market development plans for aquaculture products to replace <br />those lost by the private aquaculture industry due to this policy. Examples include: <br />funding continued disease inspection/certification services to allow corninued expansion of <br />Coldwater and warmwater fish markets elsewhere; allow private sector fish producers the <br />opportunity to serve state, federal, and tribal fish stacking requirements; and/or require all <br />live sportfish used to satisfy any landowner incentive program resulting from this recovery <br />plan must be procured from the private Colorado Aquaculture Industry. <br />• Eliminate the 6500 msl elevation criteria to reduce the impact area and only restrict <br />stocking activities within designated critical habitat. <br />• Allow the private sector aquaculture community an opportunity to produce and distribute <br />these endangered fishes to increase the availability offish while reducing the risk of having <br />all production fish in the program in one or two facilities. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.