My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8109
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8109
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:08:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8109
Author
Mitchell, M. J.
Title
Impact of the Proceedures for Stocking Non Native Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin on Private Landowners and the Commercial Aquaculture Industry
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
Inventory of Public and Private Ponds Along the Upper Colorado and Lower Gunnison Rivers in Colorado-Draft.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />• Voluntary compliance is the only way these procedures will be effective. The complexity <br />of these procedures will impact and reduce voluntary compliance. <br />• The complexity of the procedures represents a significant hurdle to overcome in general <br />sales situations. It will reduce the appeal of private sector aquaculture products by <br />making their legal use difficult to understand. <br />Market Impacts: <br />• <br />• <br />• The procedures impact 38% of the historic west slope nonnative warrnwater fish sales <br />made by the private aquaculture industry based on application of the procedures in <br />designated critical habitat. Implementation of the 6500 msl criteria increases the impact to <br />58% of the historic customer base. (Source: Colorado Department of Agriculture survey <br />offish suppliers completed in 1994) <br />• The Colorado West Slope represents a rapidly expanding market far nonnative warmwater <br />fish stocking. Private warmwater aquaculture product sales are three times that of a <br />decade ago. The procedures as written will eliminate almost 60% of this market. <br />• The procedures establish a review process for all stocking proposals that is untenable for <br />the normal conduct of private aquaculture commerce. This process will effectively <br />eliminate all stockings except those easiest to understand and implement in Table 1. <br />• Criteria required to stock in Table 1 create additional costs for private landowners <br />(evaluations of connectivity, antimigration devices, other physical improvements} thereby <br />indirectly increasing the cost of private sector aquaculture products. <br />• Criteria proposed for stocking within the 50 year floodplain of designated critical habitat,. <br />specifically allowing limited use of largemouth bass, bluegill, black crappie, and triploid <br />grass carp could reduce the loss of private sector nonnative warmwater fish species cash <br />sales by 24%- 48°/a. <br />• Implementation of the proposed landowner incentive program will create additional <br />demand for sahnonici gamefish species. Private aquaculture operations- that produce <br />and/or distribute these products can benefit from this increased demand if the program is <br />designed to utilize private sector produced salmonids. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.