Laserfiche WebLink
<br />21 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />:1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Table 9. <br /> <br />Summary of overwinter habitat suitability of 14 backwaters sampled during <br />winter of 1993-94. <br /> <br />Site # (River Mile) Suitable Habitat Reason Not Suitable <br />Backwater Channel Type Through Winter <br /> (Yes/No) <br />Reach 1 <br />1 (332.0) chute No Backwater became a flow-through from <br /> unknown channel morphology changes <br />2 (329.7) chute Yes <br />3 (328.5) scour No Ice jams caused darning and flow-through <br />4 (327.3) chute No Ice jams caused darning and flow-through <br />Reach 2 <br />5 (316.2) eddy-return Yes <br />6 (314.7) chute Yes <br />7 (314.7) scour Yes <br />8 (298.2) chute Yes <br />9 (297.2) chute Yes <br />10 (295.5) chute No Ice jams caused darning and flow-through <br />11 (293.0) chute Yes <br />12 (292.5) scour Yes <br />Reach 3 <br />13 (258.3) chute Yes <br />14 (255.8) chute No Ice jam caused darning and flow-through <br />