Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I'~ <br />~ <br />i <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />I: <br />I' <br />I' <br />I <br />I~ <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />, J <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />consistent, but sample site and fish capture locations should be considered <br />close approximations; generally within one mile of the actual site. <br />This report also provides a brief description of current fisheries <br />investigations in the White River within the state of Utah. This section is <br />intended to update WRSOC on current studies near Tracts Ua and Ub. <br />The final section of this survey is a discussion of the feasibility of <br />using fishes as an ecosystem environmental monitoring tool. This assessment <br />considers the completeness and appropriateness of the known fisheries data <br />discussed earlier and anticipated data collections of current studies. Data <br />gaps are identified and the need for a fishes monitoring program is <br />explored. The second part of this discussion section considers the need and <br />feasibility of a monitoring program for threatened and endangered fishes in <br />the White River. These needs are discussed in light of the requirements of <br />Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for permitting of oil shale <br />operations. <br /> <br />KNOWN FISHERIES STUDIES OF THE WHITE RIVER, UTAH <br /> <br />Well-documented fisheries investigations of the White River are lacking <br />prior to 1974. Studies since then have documented species incidence and <br />composition with the major emphasis on threatened and endangered fishes. A <br />number of early investigations were conducted in the Green River in and <br />around the mouth of the White River (Vanicek 1967, Vanicek et al. 1970, <br />Holden and Stalnaker 1975, McAda 1977, Seethaler 1978) but few sampled <br />