My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8192
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8192
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 10:52:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8192
Author
Wydoski, D.
Title
Review of Report Regarding Evaluation of Gravel-Pit Ponds.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />that the floodplain habitat not contain deep depression <br />ponds. <br /> <br />(2) Where feasible and practical, gravel-pit ponds that are <br />relati vely shallow could be back-filled, sloped to drain <br />as the river subsides, and allowed to function as an <br />emphemeral wetland. <br /> <br />NOTE: Some ponds probably fall into this category but I <br />suspect a small number. Unless the ponds were shallow, <br />it would probably be cost-prohibitive to pump them dry <br />and to haul substrate for fill <br /> <br />(3) Coordinate Recovery Program efforts with companies with <br />active gravel~ning operations to create stepped <br />terraces leading to the river during their mining <br />activities so that the terraces drain when high <br />streamflows reside. <br /> <br />NOTE: This effort would be strictly voluntary since the <br />mining companies probably do not have such stipulations <br />on their mining permit. <br /> <br />(4) Work with appropriate federal and state agencies to have <br />stipulations added to new permits for gravel mining such <br />that depressions are sloped to the river when ~e mining <br />operation ceases. <br /> <br />NOTE: The Ecological Services folks should be able to <br />provide ideas on how this would be best accomplished. <br /> <br />(SJ Use deeper depression ponds as grow-out ponds for <br />captive-rearing of select endangered fishes. If <br />practical, such ponds should be drained and the bottoms <br />sloped so that seining would be feasible to harvest <br />captive-reared fish for stocking. <br /> <br />NOTE: Based on Doug OsRl1mdson's work with growth of -the <br />razorback sucker and Colorado squawfish in off-c~~nnel <br />ponds, both species will grow well in such environments <br />if they are predator-free. Squawfish switch their diets <br />from macro-invertebrates to fish when about 100 mm. TL. <br />Therefore, some ponds might be used to raise forage fish <br />for the squawfish. Capture of en(J;mgered fish in the <br />past was difficult because the fish could escape the gear <br />used to harvest them. Sloping the bottom for seining <br />should eliminate that problem. <br /> <br />Grow-out ponds provide a "half-way house" for captive- <br />reared razorback sucker juveniles from the hatchery pond <br />environment where they are reared as family lots until <br />they can be tagged until they are stocked into the river <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.