My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8192
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8192
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 10:52:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8192
Author
Wydoski, D.
Title
Review of Report Regarding Evaluation of Gravel-Pit Ponds.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />iLJq7 Wy dfJJK\ <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />''1 l J-.. <br /> <br />m~@U\Yl~~ <br /> <br />Bob Burdick, Frank Pfeifer I~.J NJ3 II99l ~ <br /> <br />D~ck Wydosk~ "--r): 11 I COLORADO RIVER FISHERY PROJECT <br />. . ~?...... ~ GRANO JUNCTlON. CO 81S05 <br />Review of Report Regarding Evaluation of Gravel-Pit Ponds <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />July 30, 1997 <br /> <br />I appreciated the opportunity to review the manuscript on nNative <br />and Nonnative Fish Use of Two Gravel-Pit Ponds Connected to the <br />Upper Colorado River at 29 5/8 Road near Grand Junction, Coloradon. <br />The information in the report will be very useful to me in writing <br />the Environmental Assessment on acquisi tion and restoration of <br />floodplain habitats. <br /> <br />Overall the report was well done -- it was clearly written and <br />fairly concise. The tables and figures S1J~rize the data very <br />well. Hast of my comments are in red pen on the actual manuscript. <br /> <br />Several points that should be brought out in the paper include: <br /> <br />1. Much of the floodplain habitat in the Upper Colorado River <br />from the Colorado-Utah state line upstream to Rifle on the <br />Colorado River and upstream to Austin on the Gunnison River <br />has been modified by hnmans either from levee construction or: . <br />mining gravel. The numerous gravel-pit ponds :I1ave altered the <br />natural floodplain by creating depressionstb~.t are deep. with <br />irregular-shaped bottoms. Presently, some floodplains contain <br />only.gravel-pit ponds. Therefore, habitat acquisition and <br />restoration activities by the Recovery Program will have to <br />focus on such floodplains. <br /> <br />2. In general, your recommendations are valid. However, some <br />revisions might be warranted. Your first recommendation is to <br />avoid connectinq isolated ponds to the river that are <br />depressions. Many of the gravel-pit ponds fall into this <br />category so this recommendation would limit' habitat <br />restoration efforts in the Upper Colorado River. <br /> <br />(1) Reconnect former floodplain habitats without deep <br />depression ponds with the river to allow the river to <br />function as a natural ecosystem. Such former floodplain <br />habi tats have been separated from the river through levee <br />construction so it would be cost-effective and practical <br />to acquire rights to use of the land through easements or <br />fee-title so the floodplain could be reconnected with the <br />river by eXcavating a notch. <br /> <br />NOTE: I envision this strategy as applying only to areas <br />where levees were constructed to prevent flooding of <br />agricultural lands. A key point with this strategy is <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.