<br />2009 CWCB Tamarisk & Russian Olive Cost SharinQ Grant Program Applications
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />App# IApplicant Project name Grant $ Total $ CWCB $ as Acres Potential Issues
<br /> Requested Project % of Total treated
<br />NE3 Weld County Weed TRO - Cache La $60,000 $131,787 45.53% 120 1. Project sites not apparent on map; 2. proposes additional
<br /> Div. Poudre River mapping
<br />SE2 Bent Cons. Disl. Bent CD TRO $85,600 $209,550 40,85% 200 1, May not be consistent with ARKWIPP plan priorities, or
<br /> possible overlap with project SE1; 2. Project sites not
<br /> identified, poor map, depends on/and owner signup through
<br /> EQIP; 3. Need more certainty as to NRCS fund availability
<br />NW2 City of Grand Watson Island Complex $117,600 $300,000 39.20% 70 no apparent issues, straight forward, looks good
<br /> Junction Restoration
<br />NE4 Yuma County Pest Republican River $120,000 $510,000 23.53% 731 1. Mu~i-phased, may be difficuh to determine where funds will
<br /> Control Disl. Watershed Riparian be used, may need more targeUed scope; 2. Some
<br /> Restoration potential to assist with Compact water delivery obligations
<br />SE4 Sangre de Cristo Upper Arkansas $131,160 $374,735 35.00% 400 1. Proposes 250 different proje!:t participants; 2. includes
<br /> RC&D Watershed Riparian other non-TRO invasives treatment; 3, includes reveg
<br /> Restoration research component; 4. Land Board cash can't count toward
<br /> match, but meet 50% min wlout it: 5. Claimed NRCS cost
<br /> share level not documented
<br />SW1 Ute Mountain Ute Ute Mountain Tribe $150,417 $300,834 50.00% 308 1, no map as of 5/2/09; 2. some budget eITors to resolve; 3.
<br /> Tribe Mancos Canyon TRO need to verify NRCS funding rates and level
<br />NE1 Boulder County Boulder County $200,000 $465,000 43,01% did not 1. proposes subgrants by county to other local entities: 2.
<br /> Parks & Open Collaborative TRO specify map does not identify priority aTllas; 3. weak riparian
<br /> SDace connection??
<br />SE1 Southeastern ARKWIPP Riparian $200,000 $490,200 40.80% 985 1, 4 distinct project sites betwelln Pueblo and Kansas
<br /> Colorado Water Restoration Stateline, some possible overlap in Bent County, possible
<br /> Cons, Disl. management difficulties?; 2. some prior inkind contribution
<br /> claims will reauire substantiation
<br />SE3 Branson-Trinchera Purgatoire River $200,000 $411,030 48.66% 800 1. 2 separate project sites; 2. Improper use of state funds
<br /> Cons. Disl. Watershed Riparian for inkind match calculation will reduce amount of CWCB
<br /> Restoration funds by - $20,000; 3, $85,000 of DOW funds not confirmed
<br />
<br />SW3 The Nature
<br />Conservancy
<br />
<br />Dolores Restoration
<br />
<br />$200,000 $714,500
<br />
<br />27.99%
<br />
<br />Total Proiects over $50,000 -
<br />T
<br />
<br />$1.464,777 $3,907,636
<br />
<br />1399 1, 55 mile project reach, focused on 8 sites, but unclear on
<br />map; 2. 51 % of land is federal, only 2.1 % of cash from
<br />federal sources; 3, large cost f,,, TNC management counted
<br />as inkind contribution;
<br />
<br />App # Applicant
<br />
<br />Project name
<br />
<br />Projects Eli ible for $100,000 Small Prolect Set Aside Funds
<br />Grant $ Total $ CWCB $ as Acres Potential Issues
<br />Requested Project % of Total treated
<br />
<br />NW3 Westem Colorado Island Acres TRO
<br />Conservation
<br />Corps
<br />
<br />$10,000
<br />
<br />$31,383
<br />
<br />31.86% not stated 1. Project is on State Park land, no parks' funds, but they will
<br />conduct monitoring at no chargllto project; 2. significant
<br />volunteer work coordinated by Tamarisk Coalition;
<br />
<br />NE2
<br />
<br />Sedgwick County TRO Removal, Wildlife
<br />Cons. Dlsl. Approval
<br />Dolores Cons. Disl. McElmo Creek
<br />Tamarisk Removal
<br />
<br />$15,460
<br />
<br />$38,105
<br />
<br />40,57%
<br />
<br />$100,760
<br />
<br />33.74%
<br />
<br />SW2
<br />
<br />$34,000
<br />
<br />NW5
<br />
<br />National wild Integration of Tamarisk
<br />Turkey Federation Biological Control
<br />
<br />$43,000
<br />
<br />$86,000
<br />
<br />50.00%
<br />
<br />NW1
<br />
<br />Delta County
<br />Noxious Weed
<br />Program
<br />Douglas Cr &
<br />While River Cons.
<br />Disls.
<br />
<br />Delta County River
<br />Restoration
<br />
<br />$50.000
<br />
<br />$202,500
<br />
<br />24.69%
<br />
<br />NW4
<br />
<br />Douglas Creek TRO
<br />Removal
<br />
<br />$50,000
<br />
<br />$100,000
<br />
<br />50.00%1
<br />
<br />l
<br />
<br />Total Proiects $50,000 or less =
<br />
<br />$202.460
<br />
<br />$558,748
<br />
<br />677 no issues apparent, looks good
<br />
<br />200 1, 100+ landowners, focused on 3 specific sites, but may be
<br />management issue; 2. used altemate budget form, not clear
<br />how CWCB funds will be applied to overall project
<br />
<br />43 1. part of ongoing project on single parcel of private land,
<br />most of CWCB funds for reveg of previously controlled areas:
<br />2, limited landowner contribution shown on budget; 3.
<br />Applicant is out-of-state NGE, charging CWCB for project
<br />administration.
<br />
<br />825 1. 76% of acres are federal, but sizeable federal contributions
<br />as well: 2. need to verify sources and timing of various other
<br />grant funds claimed toward match
<br />
<br />70 - 90 1. Unclear from map and budget where actual treatment will
<br />occur; 2. 95% of infested area is BLM ground, minimal
<br />federal funds in budget: 3. includas beeUe release at no
<br />charge to project
<br />
<br />-r
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
|