Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2009 CWCB Tamarisk & Russian Olive Cost SharinQ Grant Program Applications <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />App# IApplicant Project name Grant $ Total $ CWCB $ as Acres Potential Issues <br /> Requested Project % of Total treated <br />NE3 Weld County Weed TRO - Cache La $60,000 $131,787 45.53% 120 1. Project sites not apparent on map; 2. proposes additional <br /> Div. Poudre River mapping <br />SE2 Bent Cons. Disl. Bent CD TRO $85,600 $209,550 40,85% 200 1, May not be consistent with ARKWIPP plan priorities, or <br /> possible overlap with project SE1; 2. Project sites not <br /> identified, poor map, depends on/and owner signup through <br /> EQIP; 3. Need more certainty as to NRCS fund availability <br />NW2 City of Grand Watson Island Complex $117,600 $300,000 39.20% 70 no apparent issues, straight forward, looks good <br /> Junction Restoration <br />NE4 Yuma County Pest Republican River $120,000 $510,000 23.53% 731 1. Mu~i-phased, may be difficuh to determine where funds will <br /> Control Disl. Watershed Riparian be used, may need more targeUed scope; 2. Some <br /> Restoration potential to assist with Compact water delivery obligations <br />SE4 Sangre de Cristo Upper Arkansas $131,160 $374,735 35.00% 400 1. Proposes 250 different proje!:t participants; 2. includes <br /> RC&D Watershed Riparian other non-TRO invasives treatment; 3, includes reveg <br /> Restoration research component; 4. Land Board cash can't count toward <br /> match, but meet 50% min wlout it: 5. Claimed NRCS cost <br /> share level not documented <br />SW1 Ute Mountain Ute Ute Mountain Tribe $150,417 $300,834 50.00% 308 1, no map as of 5/2/09; 2. some budget eITors to resolve; 3. <br /> Tribe Mancos Canyon TRO need to verify NRCS funding rates and level <br />NE1 Boulder County Boulder County $200,000 $465,000 43,01% did not 1. proposes subgrants by county to other local entities: 2. <br /> Parks & Open Collaborative TRO specify map does not identify priority aTllas; 3. weak riparian <br /> SDace connection?? <br />SE1 Southeastern ARKWIPP Riparian $200,000 $490,200 40.80% 985 1, 4 distinct project sites betwelln Pueblo and Kansas <br /> Colorado Water Restoration Stateline, some possible overlap in Bent County, possible <br /> Cons, Disl. management difficulties?; 2. some prior inkind contribution <br /> claims will reauire substantiation <br />SE3 Branson-Trinchera Purgatoire River $200,000 $411,030 48.66% 800 1. 2 separate project sites; 2. Improper use of state funds <br /> Cons. Disl. Watershed Riparian for inkind match calculation will reduce amount of CWCB <br /> Restoration funds by - $20,000; 3, $85,000 of DOW funds not confirmed <br /> <br />SW3 The Nature <br />Conservancy <br /> <br />Dolores Restoration <br /> <br />$200,000 $714,500 <br /> <br />27.99% <br /> <br />Total Proiects over $50,000 - <br />T <br /> <br />$1.464,777 $3,907,636 <br /> <br />1399 1, 55 mile project reach, focused on 8 sites, but unclear on <br />map; 2. 51 % of land is federal, only 2.1 % of cash from <br />federal sources; 3, large cost f,,, TNC management counted <br />as inkind contribution; <br /> <br />App # Applicant <br /> <br />Project name <br /> <br />Projects Eli ible for $100,000 Small Prolect Set Aside Funds <br />Grant $ Total $ CWCB $ as Acres Potential Issues <br />Requested Project % of Total treated <br /> <br />NW3 Westem Colorado Island Acres TRO <br />Conservation <br />Corps <br /> <br />$10,000 <br /> <br />$31,383 <br /> <br />31.86% not stated 1. Project is on State Park land, no parks' funds, but they will <br />conduct monitoring at no chargllto project; 2. significant <br />volunteer work coordinated by Tamarisk Coalition; <br /> <br />NE2 <br /> <br />Sedgwick County TRO Removal, Wildlife <br />Cons. Dlsl. Approval <br />Dolores Cons. Disl. McElmo Creek <br />Tamarisk Removal <br /> <br />$15,460 <br /> <br />$38,105 <br /> <br />40,57% <br /> <br />$100,760 <br /> <br />33.74% <br /> <br />SW2 <br /> <br />$34,000 <br /> <br />NW5 <br /> <br />National wild Integration of Tamarisk <br />Turkey Federation Biological Control <br /> <br />$43,000 <br /> <br />$86,000 <br /> <br />50.00% <br /> <br />NW1 <br /> <br />Delta County <br />Noxious Weed <br />Program <br />Douglas Cr & <br />While River Cons. <br />Disls. <br /> <br />Delta County River <br />Restoration <br /> <br />$50.000 <br /> <br />$202,500 <br /> <br />24.69% <br /> <br />NW4 <br /> <br />Douglas Creek TRO <br />Removal <br /> <br />$50,000 <br /> <br />$100,000 <br /> <br />50.00%1 <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />Total Proiects $50,000 or less = <br /> <br />$202.460 <br /> <br />$558,748 <br /> <br />677 no issues apparent, looks good <br /> <br />200 1, 100+ landowners, focused on 3 specific sites, but may be <br />management issue; 2. used altemate budget form, not clear <br />how CWCB funds will be applied to overall project <br /> <br />43 1. part of ongoing project on single parcel of private land, <br />most of CWCB funds for reveg of previously controlled areas: <br />2, limited landowner contribution shown on budget; 3. <br />Applicant is out-of-state NGE, charging CWCB for project <br />administration. <br /> <br />825 1. 76% of acres are federal, but sizeable federal contributions <br />as well: 2. need to verify sources and timing of various other <br />grant funds claimed toward match <br /> <br />70 - 90 1. Unclear from map and budget where actual treatment will <br />occur; 2. 95% of infested area is BLM ground, minimal <br />federal funds in budget: 3. includas beeUe release at no <br />charge to project <br /> <br />-r <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />