My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Organizing for Endangered and Threatened Species Habitat Draft
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Organizing for Endangered and Threatened Species Habitat Draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:36:29 PM
Creation date
5/28/2009 1:12:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.100
Description
Adaptive Management Workgroup (PRRIP)
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Author
David M. Freeman, Ph.D,, Annie Epperson and Troy Lepper
Title
Organizing for Endangered and Threatened Species Habitat Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0 <br />? <br />? <br />? <br />? promised scientific-sounding activities, such as "conservation," "research," "monitoring," and <br />"stocking," were inadequate to insure survival of species (Wood 1998) (Sax 1999; Sax 2000). <br />? Collaboration was seen as risking the surrender of national interests to local interests, and would <br />. allow resource users to retain too much control of what they have always had. Such voices held <br />. that it would be better to stay remote, uncooperative, and force issues through courts. Such <br />arguments have led to deep rifts between those more moderate representatives who favored <br />? negotiated solutions, and those deeply suspicious of both the process and the outcome. <br />Environmental Organizations <br />? The Platte River Whooping Crane Habitat Maintenance Trust (the Trust), was funded with <br />? monies provided by the Wyoming Grayrocks settlement. Using litigious means, and the threat of <br />? such means, as a lever, the Trust was active in the thirteen year controversy over the FERC re- <br />• licensing of Kingsley Dam and also strongly advanced environmental interests in the conflict <br />• between Wyoming and Nebraska over division of North Platte river flows. It would become an <br />important environmental player in the Platte river collaborative process. <br />The National Audubon Society was originally incorporated in 1905 in New York to stop <br />the slaughter of birds for millinery commerce. After that success, the Audubon Society continued <br />to advocate for wild birds, and by the mid-1990's had a staff of 300 employees and 570,000 <br />members. Audubon has had a long history of lobbying for state and federal protection of habitat <br />and has developed its own system of about 100 bird sanctuaries. Audubon became interested in <br />the status of the whooping crane on the central Platte in the 1940s. By the 1970s, the society <br />became involved in a series of discussions about water diversion and storage proposals, and by <br />taking legal action to protect riparian habitat. In 1973, the society purchased 782 acres of pristine <br />crane habitat for a sanctuary along the Platte east of Kearney Nebraska. Additional acreage has <br />been purchased since, and cooperative agreements have extended protections beyond the <br />sanctuary. The society was active in the re-licensing of Kingsley Dam, and became an important <br />force in Platte river recovery negotiations. <br />? Environmental Defense (up to 1999, the Environmental Defense Fund) was originally <br /> incorporated in 1967 by a group of Long Island conservationists to ban the use of the pesticide <br />? DDT. This organization, by 2001 had 300,000 members, a staff of 234, including scientists, <br />• ecologists and attorneys, and an operating budget of nearly $43 million. The Environmental <br />. Defense Fund has promoted the idea that a healthy economy and a viable natural environment are <br /> not mutually exclusive. Environmental Defense played an active and important role in <br />? negotiations up to early months of 2002 when the organization announced a reallocation of its <br />? assets, a review of its priorities, and withdrew its representative from the negotiations. After the <br />• withdrawal of Environmental Defense from the process, the National Wildlife Federation would <br />? step forward to occupy a lead role. <br />The National Wildlife Federation (NWF) has been one of the largest, oldest, and most <br />active of environmental organizations. As the "General Motors" of the North American <br />environmental movement (Shabecoff 2000), it has been a major force for environmental causes <br />across the U.S. landscape. It had annual budgets, in the late 1990's, in the range of $100,000,000 <br />and almost 2,000,000 members not to mention several more million supporters. The NWF has <br />54
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.