My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Options for Consideration
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Options for Consideration
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:36:06 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 11:10:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8420.500
Description
South Platte River Basin Task Force
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Author
South Platte River Task Force
Title
Options for Consideration
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SOUTH PLATTE RIVER TASK FORCE <br />Options for Consideration <br />NOTE: THESE OPTIONS ARE MERELY SUGGESTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN <br />PROVIDED TO THE SOUTH PLATTE TASK FORCE. THIS LIST WILL CHANGE. <br />NONE OF THE OPTIONS LISTED HAS BEEN ENDORSED OR ADOPTED BY THE <br />SOUTH PLATTE TASK FORCE. <br />1. Suggestions for making water available for well augmentation or <br />decreasing amount of augmentation water required to augment wells <br />a. Pursue voluntary agreements with downstream reservoirs (e.g., <br />"Gentlemen's Agreement"). <br />• Can these be done without going to water court? May require rulemaking. <br />• Need to be approved by State and Division Engineers to ensure no injury <br />occurs. <br />• 37-80-120, C.R.S. does not allow out of priority storage in reservoirs if the <br />user cannot promptly release water. Nevertheless, water users have been <br />allowed storage to occur without this ability. While this has been allowed <br />historically under the "Gentleman's Agreement", there is no clear statutory <br />basis for altowing this to continue. <br />• Some users who may not be able to meet the requirements of 37-80-120, <br />C.R.S. proposed the use of an alternative supply to provide replacement <br />of out of priority diversions if necessary. For instance, a user may <br />propose that they would replace out-of-priority diversions from a lined <br />gravel pit if users senior to the out of priority storage right don't fill. It is not <br />clear DWR has the authority to approve this absent court or legislative <br />direction that this is allowable. <br />b. Allow aggregated, deferred replacement of well depletions during the <br />non irrigation season- this depends on the ability of the State Engineer to make a <br />reliable determination that reservoirs are likely to fill in the upcoming season. <br />• If DWR would allow delayed aggregated replacement then reservoir paper fill <br />accounting would be required only to the extent that replacements are required <br />• DWR has allowed and will continue to allow limited aggregation of replacement <br />to occur in a month during the non-irrigation season if no injury will occur for <br />efficiency purposes. The water court has long recognized the practice of minimal <br />aggregation of replacement if there is not injury. If there is not injury, DWR will
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.