|
Feasibility Evaluation of the Arkansas Valley Pipeline
<br />Water Works! Committee
<br />June 2003
<br />TABLE 3.1
<br />SELECTED DATA FROM SURVEY
<br /> Taps Avera a Demand 2000 per 2020 2000
<br />Water System County 2000 2000 2020 Tap Taps 2000 Peak PeaklAverage Comments
<br /> Pd) ( Pd 19Pd) I9Pd)
<br />Cities/TownslDistricts
<br />1. May Valley Water Prowers 582 282,706 353,852 486 728 536,000 1.9 11 deep wells; filtered, chlorinated
<br />Association
<br />2. Lamar Water De artment Prowers 4,300 2,700,000 3,140,000 628 5,001 5,400,000 2.0 28 active wells; chlorination/fluoridation
<br />3. Town of Swink Otero 285 48,700 77,000 171 451 53,000 1.1 Soft water system; 3 deep wells;
<br />filtration/chlorination
<br /> 261 153 600 153,600 589 261 Hard waters stem; same sources
<br />4. Town of Olne S rin s Crowle 203 70,000 70,000 345 203 144,000 2.1 Well; stud in s rin s
<br />5. Town of Crowle Crowle 115 31,200 37,000 271 136 49,000 1.6 Water urchased from Crowle Count
<br />6. Town of Su ar Cit Crowle 235 95,000 105,000 404 260 160,000 1.7 5 wells; chlorination
<br />7. Cit of Rock Ford Otero 1,668 1,000,000 1,800,000 600 3,002 1,500,000 1.5 2 wells and ditch water; filtration
<br />8. McClave Water gent 174 59,000 64,000 339 189 114,000 1.9 5 deep wells; chlorination
<br />Association
<br />9. Town of Wiley Prowers 201 5,000 100,000 323 309 110,000 1.7 2 deep wells, filtration for iron,
<br />chlorination
<br />10. City of LaJunta Otero 3,179 2,500,000 3,500,000 786 4,451 6,500,000 2.6 16 alluvial wells; chlorination; RO is
<br />tanned
<br />11. South Swink Water Otero 240 76
<br />700 000
<br />99 320 310 10,000 1.7 4 deep wells, 3 used, #2 is backup;
<br />Com an , , filtration and chlorination
<br />12. Hancock Water Com an Otero 46 11,750 35,500 255 139 45,000 3.8 2 dee wells; filtration/chlorination
<br />13. Homestead Water District Otero 25 20,000 30,000 800 38 30,000 1.5 Deep well; chlorination, connecting to
<br />LaJunta; data uncertain
<br />14. 96 Pi eline Com an Crowle 84 Water urchased from Crowle Count
<br />Charles Mesa
<br />15
<br />St Pueblo 3,785 2,200,000 3,500,000 581 6,022 5,400,000 2.5 Surface water; 4 wells; conventional
<br />.
<br />. treatment lant
<br />16. Southside Water Otero 24 12,000 15,000 500 30 20,000 1.7 Deep well; chlorination
<br />Association
<br />17. Parkdale Water Otero 13 10,0-00 15,000 769 20 12,000 1.2 Dee well; chlorination
<br />Manzanola
<br />18 Otero 233 570
<br />65 66
<br />000 281 235 148,000 2.3 4 deep wells; filtration, chlorination,
<br />. , , softenin
<br />Total 15,569 9,401,226 13,160,952 604 21,795 20,351,000 2.2
<br />Master Meter Service
<br />19. Crowley County Water Crowley 9 770,000 1,200,000 85,556 1,270,000 1.6 5 alluvial wells; chlorination
<br />S stem
<br />Ordway
<br />20 Crowley 2 75,000 75,000 37,500 90,000 1.2 8 wells; service to 2 master meters; data
<br />. uncertain
<br />GEI Consultants, rtlC. 01284 03-0630 Feasibility Evaluation Final
<br />
|