Laserfiche WebLink
iii. Type of ~,rrater use that ~~.ould cause the injury: <br />iv. analysis shor;~~in~ :~~h;,J full !SF protection is_ net possible: <br />v. ~7etailed description of the proposed r:-riticatior~. inciudi+p all measures taken to <br />reduce or minimize the injury: <br />vi. Jetaiied description: of ho°~~; the proposed mitigation ..till enable the Board to <br />continue to preserve or imwrove the natural envircnmerit of the affe ~' Cream fo <br />cte:~ s <br />a reas~nabe decree despite the iniur~,i: <br />vii. Identification and feasibility analysis of all other alternatives considered. including <br />discussion of environmental and economic benefits and consenuences of each <br />alternative: and <br />viii. A discussion of the reasonableness of each alternative considered. <br />~f after recei t and revier,~~ ofi the re -aired ir:-for mation. staff .',~i11 consult ith the ~O~"J and <br />~fLith the entity that oriuinaiiy recommended the affected ISF v~ater rights(s (i# other than: <br />~O~r"v i to determine La~hether additional field ~~~ork is recessar~,+ and to identify any <br />scheduling concerns. Staff yyill request a recommendation from the DC4'V as to ~,~hether <br />the -ro -osed mill -anon 'hill enable the Board to continue to reserve or im rive the <br />natural environment of the affected stream to a reasonable degree despite the iniurv. <br />includin a discussion of the reasonableness of t^e altefnatiVeS considered. <br />• <br />r-) Prior to brincing the ro~osal to the Board for rrelimina =consideration. staff v~~ill consult <br />~~,iith the uivision of y'!ater Resou~_ces cr v,-hether the proposal ~y.-ould result- in the Division <br />of ~J'~Iater Resources bein unable to administer the affected ISF L~.ater ri htfs' in <br />accordance ,~/ith the priority system or ~r~ith Colorado ~~+Iater'a~v. <br />h) At the first meeting of the t~~~o-meeting process required by this F~ule. staff ~;~ill bring the <br />proposal to the Board for preliminary; consideration. after con;pietinq its review of the <br />roposai and its aansultatiori ~Yvith DOy~'!~- Staff Yvi!I vrork :vith the pro- onerit and interested <br />parties to address anv prelimirary concerns prior to brinaing a proposal to the Board. <br />Prelimira~ consideration b ~ the Board ma~• result i;t re^uests for more information or for <br />chap -es to the proposal. Staff ti~~ill vork_4~rith the proponent and interested parties to <br />finalize the pro osal and bring it back to the Board for fina action at a subse^uent Board <br />rneeting. <br />(i i The Board will consider the followin ,factors ~~~hen evaluating lniur,~ ~~ith tvlitigatior <br />proposals. Because (nu^,r v~ith 14~itigation proposals may im~olve unique factual situations. <br />the Board may c~r;sic'er additior+,a! factors in specific cases. Further. evaluation of each <br />Injury ~.-(th P:litiaatior~ proposal ~~itl require the exercise of professional judgment recarding <br />the specific facts of the proposal- <br />i Extent of the proposed in;ury: <br />? . Location. of iniu -affected streams` aru len th of affected reaches`: <br />2. amount. timin and fireguencv of shorta e(s to the affected ISF ~~~ater <br />rightts;; and <br />3. Poter:tial impact to the natural environment of the affected stream <br />reachies; from such shortage±s-. <br />• <br />