Laserfiche WebLink
Water From Colorado's Bark Beetle Forests -Project Overview <br />Elder, Rhoades & Hubbard; USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station; 5/15/08 <br />consequences of various management alternatives require managers to base their actions <br />onwell-designed research that evaluates multiple land management alternatives. <br />OBJECTIVES <br />The North Platte Basin Roundtable and citizens of the Colorado high country have <br />identified large-scale bark beetle outbreaks and forest management activities as priority <br />concerns for the management of water resources for the next 30 years. In response, our <br />proposed research will address how the current bark beetle outbreak and subsequent <br />management practices influence the delivery of clean water and forest recovery in the <br />North Platte and Upper Colorado Basins. Specifically, this study will compare the <br />consequences of four distinct management options that are currently employed to treat <br />extensive bark beetle outbreaks in Colorado forests. The alternatives comprise a gradient <br />of treatments that span from no action to intensive mechanical fuel reduction, and as such <br />they create distinct amounts of forest structure, surface roughness and soil disturbance. <br />At one end of the spectrum, No Action (Option #1) retains standing dead pine snags, <br />large downed wood and maximum surface roughness. Salvage logging conducted using <br />Watershed Protection (Option #2) goals retains logging residue and existing understory <br />vegetation to maintain roughness and avoid soil disturbance. Traditional Fuel Reduction <br />(Option #3) practices remove post-harvest slash, and harvesting aimed at maximizing <br />Forest Regeneration (Option #4) combines slash removal with mechanical site <br />scarification to create mineral seedbed that promote seedling establishment. We propose <br />to evaluate the utility of each of these management approaches to guide forest <br />management decisions that are appropriate for the complex mountainous terrain of North <br />Platte and Upper Colorado basin headwater forests. <br />RESEARCH APPROACH <br />Our research will take an operational-scale approach to evaluate management options on <br />Colorado State and US Forest Service lands situated at the headwaters of the North Platte <br />and Upper Colorado Rivers. Our scientific and management outcomes benefit from links <br />to on-going, multidisciplinary watershed-scale research on MPB outbreaks and <br />management activities conducted at the Fraser Experimental Forest and the Colorado <br />State Forest. Involvement of CSFS and USFS land managers in the design and <br />implementation of this research will establish auser-participatory framework that focuses <br />research on useful questions with practical applications. Research findings will comply <br />with Healthy Forest Restoration Act provisions that require the USFS to track fuel <br />reduction activities (USDA/USDOI 2005). Such information will contribute to <br />development of guidelines for management of beetle-killed forests to sustain watershed <br />resources. <br />To capture landscape variability in bark beetle and management effects we will conduct <br />work at replicate study areas throughout the upper portions of each basin. We have <br />identified four candidate study areas on the Colorado State Forest, the Routt NF and the <br />Fraser Experimental Forest/Arapaho-Roosevelt NFs that provide opportunities to <br />compare uncut and salvage logging treatments on adjacent sites with uniform forest and