Laserfiche WebLink
Water From Colorado's Bark Beetle Forests -Project Overview <br />Elder, Rhoades & Hubbard; USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station; 5/15/08 <br />water and nutrient use in beetle-killed forests will vary based on site environmental <br />conditions, overstory species composition and the density of the forest understory. <br />Catastrophic pine mortality has created public anxiety and prompted a rapid management <br />response to address concerns about elevated wildfire risk on state, private and federal <br />forestland. The US Forest Service is currently using provisions of the Healthy Forest <br />Restoration Act of 2003 (USDA/USDOI 2005) to expedite salvage of dead timber on <br />National Forests across northern Colorado and southern Wyoming. Treated acres have <br />expanded rapidly in recent years, but in spite of general public support for this work <br />(Western Governors Assoc. 2006), active forest management remains highly <br />controversial (Reeves et al. 2006; Rhodes 2007). Recent research on post-fire harvesting <br />challenges the effectiveness of salvage logging for reducing wildfire risk and promoting <br />forest regeneration (Donato et al. 2006). Similarly, environmental groups in Colorado <br />and throughout the West have raised concerns that post-beetle outbreak salvage <br />operations may impair water quality, site productivity, and watershed resources <br />(Colorado Wild 2004). However, in the steep, rugged terrain of the headwater forests of <br />the North Platte and Upper Colorado River basins the acreage accessible for salvage <br />logging is limited and proper planning and timber sale administration can protect <br />sensitive areas and watershed resources. <br />Forest harvest will accelerate watershed change inbeetle-killed pine forests. Elimination <br />of overstory interception by judicious clear cut harvesting has been shown to cause <br />immediate and sustained increases in water yield and peak discharge from Colorado <br />subalpine forest watersheds (Troendle and King 1985). The interception savings and <br />increased snowpack accumulation in harvest openings yield measurable increases in <br />streamflow as long as 20 - 30% of the forest cover is removed from a catchment <br />(Troendle and Leaf 1980; Bosch and Hewlett 1982). However, snowpack gains may be <br />offset by wind scour in large clearings (Troendle and Leaf 1980; Golding and Swanson <br />1986). Salvage operations typically create openings that surpass the size threshold (e.g. <br />5-7 tree heights / 100 - 200 m) beyond which snowpack losses become significant in <br />lodgepole ecosystems (Troendle and Leaf 1980; Swanson 1988). In such areas, retention <br />of logging slash generates a layer of surface roughness that conserves snowpack moisture <br />accumulated in openings exposed to wind scour (Pomeroy et al. 2002). The effects of <br />timber harvesting on water quality and site productivity increase with extent of physical <br />soil disturbance (Feller et al. 2000; Briggs et al. 2000) and the amount of biomass and <br />nutrient removal (Mann et al. 1988; Hornbeck et al. 1990), further justifying retention of <br />logging slash. <br />In spite of the urgency to respond to forest health threats, state and federal regulations <br />require land management practices to sustain the delivery of clean water and protection <br />soil quality and long term forest productivity. Current salvage logging in Colorado's <br />beetle-killed forests is justified primarily by immediate Fuel Reduction objectives, <br />though management priorities and specific practices that sustain Watershed Resources <br />and promote Forest Regeneration may have greater long-term merit. The management <br />response to this natural disturbance will set the trajectory of watershed and forest <br />recovery for the coming century. Scientific and public skepticism regarding the