My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
NP Minutes 10-21-08
CWCB
>
Basin Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
NP Minutes 10-21-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:58:06 PM
Creation date
11/24/2008 1:46:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
North Platte
Title
North Platte Minutes 10/08
Date
10/21/2008
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
North Platte Basin Roundtable Meeting, 10.21.2008 <br />Update on Kelly Elder's project for Pine Beetle Study: <br />Kent C & Carl T: The CWCB decided at the last meeting not to fiend federal agency <br />projects with state money. <br />Kent C: We met with Kelly Elder; he said that the money needs to go to Rocky <br />Mountain Research Station to keep overhead down, which is part of the USFS. Eric <br />Hecox said that a lot of CWCB money has gone to NOAA and USGS for studies similar <br />to Kelly's, and if we modify the recipient to Rocky Mountain Research Station in <br />cooperation with Colorado State Forest Service, and if Kelly attends the CWCB meeting <br />and makes a presentation to the CWCB to defend the project, Carl T and Eric Hecox will <br />support it. A lot of money would be lost with overhead if the project was funneled <br />through CSU. <br />Carl T: It's changing the moniker to the Rocky Mountain Research Station, from USFS. <br />It's going to save the state money, get the research done. Kelly Elder is to the bare bones <br />on his budget and can't afford to lose money in overhead. Worse case scenario the <br />project will have to wait until March. He can't revamp the figures without going through <br />the roundtable for approval. <br />Kent C: this came out because there was another project that wanted to use state money <br />to improve federal facilities. The CWCB was against that, and then it progressed from <br />that to all federal projects that carne through the last CWCB meeting. <br />Barb V: So the proposals that were tabled will be reconsidered at next CWCB meeting? <br />Carl T: Yes, that was an exception made for these projects, including Kelly's. <br />Barb V: will they be considered as a block [of federal projects] or on their individual <br />merits? <br />Carl T: No, individual projects will be considered. Kelly will be at the meeting to <br />answer CWCB's questions. <br />New Business: <br />Barb V: what is happening with the Leonard Rice study? <br />Kent C: we saw the flow diagrams, the draft model. I am gi oing to schedule Erin Wilson <br />to give a presentation in conjunction with the December 2"` roundtable meeting. <br />Carl T: are you going to bring up the other issue? <br />Kent C: we are going to discuss it at Monday's Water Conservancy meeting. The issue <br />is on federal depletions, the federal agencies are looking for an allocation under the 3 <br />state agreement from the N. Platte basin. The JCWCD is meeting with SPWRAP to <br />discuss this, and then we will meet with the governance committee of the 3-state, and will <br />discuss some trade-offs. Also, Bob Burr is going to be resigning from the Water <br />Conservancy District board, so we will be advertising for a replacement from the Illinois <br />drainage. <br />Discussion on the three-state agreement and depletion plans that cover the 13 year <br />agreement: <br />Kent C: we might modify the depletion plan covering the N. Platte, which will have to <br />go through the governance committee. A depletion plan for the 13 year increment is set <br />down and the only way to change it is through the governance committee. Population <br />reaching a certain level in this basin triggers it, exceeding the limit of 134,467 ac of <br />irrigated land triggers it, and new "industrial" uses that are not de minimis trigger it, they
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.