Laserfiche WebLink
Yuma County Water Authority Public Improvement District Agenda Item 26d <br />November 10 , 2008 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br /> <br />use a commonly developed basin - wide groundwater model to quantify groundwater deple tions to <br />river flows so groundwater use could be reflected in Compact A ccounting. Once the groundwater <br />depletions were considered in the accounting, Colorado's over all water use appeared to exceed its <br />compact entitlements. <br /> <br />Ground water impacts from we lls in Colorado included in the Compact Accounting averaged <br />approximately 25, 00 0 AF/yr over the period 2002 - 2006. These impacts are primarily due to ground <br />water diversions that occurred decades ago. Starting in 2003, Colorado has exceeded its compact <br />all ocations by an average of 11, 00 0 AF/yr . Some reduction in the amount that Colorado has <br />exceeded its compact allocations is expected in the future as the result of irrigated acreage <br />retirement programs. However, it is projected that the deficit will increas e gradually to 15,000 AF <br />in 2039. <br /> <br />In January 2008, the Republican District received approval of a $60 million loan from the CWCB <br />to finance part of the proposed $ 71 million C ompact Compliance P ipeline Project to help address <br />th e situation . The expected yi eld of the Pipeline is 15,000 AF/yr , which should be adequate to <br />ensure compact compliance for the 2 0 - year period of repayment of the Compact Compliance <br />Pipeline l oan. <br /> <br />Pioneer/Laird Ditch Litigation <br /> <br />of the Republican R iver surface water users believed that the <br />designated NHP Basin wells were causing injury to their senior surface rights, however they were <br />unsuccessful in their early legal efforts to remedy their perceived injury . <br /> <br />Based on the 2003 C ompact settlement, t he North Fork surface users asked the State Engineer to <br />curtail NHP Basin well pumping in order to protect their surface water rights. The State Engineer <br />forwarded the request to the Colorado Groundwater Commission and the Commission dismissed <br />the case. O n July 1, 2005, the North Fork surface users filed a Petition for Hearing and Appeal of <br />State Engineer Action (Case No. 05 - GW - 14). <br /> <br />The petition sought among other things to re - draw the boundaries of the NHP Basin. If the <br />settlement is not concluded and t he surface owners prevail, the litigation could result in the <br />curtailment of 1,338 irrigation wells (plus commercial and municipal wells) in Yuma County. The <br />area impacted by the lawsuits new designated basin boundary is approx. 190,000 acres of highly <br />pro ductive agriculture and several municipal wells. The curtailment of wells would have a severe <br />impact on the local economy as identified in an Economic Development Report prepared by James <br />Pritchett, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at Colo rado State University. The <br />study indicates an economic impact of $170 million in the first year of well curtailment. This will <br />loan for the Compact Compliance P ipeline, wh ich was approved by the CWCB in January 2008 <br />(HB 1346). <br /> <br />Just prior to the June 2008 Petition H earing , the Yuma County Water Authority and the surface <br />right owners agreed to a settlement where the would lease the <br />surface right s enior water rights on the North Fork of the Republican River for the rest of <br />2008 and a newly created Yuma County PID would buy the water rights for $20 million by the end <br />of 2008 . The contribute $5 million towards the <br />