My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
26d
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
26d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:37:53 PM
Creation date
11/13/2008 10:58:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/19/2008
Description
CF Section - New Project Loans - Yuma County Water Authority Public Improvement District - North Fork Water Rights Purchase
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Yuma County Water Authority Public Improvement District Agenda Item 26d <br />November 10 , 2008 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />History of Designat ed Basin Grou nd Water and Republican River Compact <br /> <br />Colorado and Nebraska began discussing a potential compact for the North Fork of the Republican <br />River in 1934. Colorado and Nebraska added Kansas to the discussions in 1935 when discussions <br />expanded from the North F ork to the basin as a whole. Negotiations increased in tempo in 1936 <br />when the Bureau of Reclamation decided that they would not build reservoirs in the Basin until <br />there was a compact between the states. The first compact was vetoed by President Roosevelt in <br />1942, but an acceptable compact was negotiated the following year. Colorado adopted the present <br />compact in 1943. <br /> <br />Beginning in 1959 drilling and use of wells increased dramatically in all three states. In the 1960s, <br />Colorado began to implement restr ictions on groundwater well permits when the Colorado Ground <br />Water Commission established designated ground water basins. In 1966, the Ogallala Aquifer in the <br />Republican River Basin in Colorado was included in the Northern High Plains Designated Ground <br />Wat er Basin (NHP Basin). <br /> <br />In 1966, the Ogallala Aquifer in the Republican River Basin in Colorado was included in the NHP <br />Basin . In 1967, due to a significant increase in the number of well permits issued within the NHP <br />Basin, Colorado ceased permitting well s in the Ogallala Aquifer in the Republican River basin that <br />were within a three - mile radius of any high - capacity existing well, if the proposed well would cause <br />a depletion rate greater than a forty percent decline in aquifer water level in 25 years (Colo rado <br />extended this restriction to further protect the aquifer in 1990 by not allowing a depletion rate <br />greater than 40 percent in the aquifer water level in 100 years). <br /> <br />In 1970 Colorado implemented a moratorium on any alluvial aquifer wells in the Repub lican River <br />basin in order to protect senior surface water rights. Since the early 1970s, Colorado has not <br />approved any new well permits for wells in the Ogallala Aquifer located within three miles of the <br />North Fork of the Republican River. In 1974, the C olorado Supreme Court confirmed that the NHP <br />Basin groundwater met the definition of designated basin water in the 1965 Act when it ruled that <br />ground water taking over a century to reach a surface stream was not part of the water subject to <br />appropriation u nder the Colorado Constitution and could be managed separately as designated <br />ground water . <br /> <br />Due to the 1974 ruling, both the State Engineer and groundwater users believed that NHP Basin <br />withdrawals from the aquifer were not subject to the Republican River Compact (Compact) , which <br />seemed limited to surface diversions that affected the flow of the Republican River. In the 1980's <br />however, Kansas became concerned that well development in Nebraska may interfere with its <br />ability to fully utilize compact entitlement. In the 1990's Kansas attempted to persuade <br />Nebraska and Colorado to adjust the Compact accounting to reflect groundwater impacts, but there <br />was no consensus between the states. In 1998, Kansas filed an original action in the United States <br />Su preme Court against Nebraska seeking to enforce its Republican River entitlem ents under the <br />Compact. Nebraska filed a cross - claim against Colorado alleging it had also violated the Compact <br />by exceeding its consumptive use. <br /> <br />The three states agreed to settl e the litigation on December 15, 2002 and the United States Supreme <br />Court adopted the final stipulation in 2003. As part of the settlement stipulation the states agreed to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.