My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25c
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
25c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:37:43 PM
Creation date
11/13/2008 10:46:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/19/2008
Description
CF Section - Changes to Existing Loans - Bijou Irrigation District - Empire Res. East Embankment Dam Repair
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Background <br /> <br />The District owns and operates Empire Reservoir located west of Fort Morgan in Weld and <br />Morgan Counties, between I 76 on the south and US Highway 34 on the north. The District <br />provides irrigation water to a 19,200 - acre service area in Morgan County, located between the <br />reservoir and the City of Fort Morgan. The District is a taxing district that levies a tax per acre <br />based on benefits received, not an ad valorem property t ax. Water stored in the reservoir is <br />delivere d to users through a sister company, Bijou Irrigation Company (Company), which <br />operates and maintains the distribution system, used for either direct ir rigation or exchanges. <br /> <br />Empire Reservoir is an off - stream reservoir const ructed in 1905. The dam is a Class 1 Dam with <br />a height of 35 feet and a crest width of 16 feet. There are essentially four separate dam <br />embankments that impound water, they are; t he Outlet D am of 2 , 300 feet , the Northwest Dam of <br />1,900 feet, the McIntyre Dam of 4,100 feet, and East Dam of 12,500 feet. <br /> <br />, due to the <br />lack of an emergency spillway . In 2006 the District obtained a CWCB loan to construct a n <br />emergency spillway, which was completed in spri ng of 2007, and the reservoir was allowed to <br />fill to it s full gauge height 30.0 . In the fall of 2007, the reservoir was restricted again to gauge <br />height 29.0 by the SEO, due to additional safety concerns. These concerns were the result of <br />s ignificant wave erosion occurring along the East Dam , resulting in sections of the existing <br />parapet wall failing and significant erosion occur ring along the toe of the dam embankment. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Due to additional work not budgeted in the original cost estimate, weather conditions, project <br />location, and unforeseen variations in cost for specific items during construction, the overall cost <br />of the project has increased significantly. <br /> <br />To address the 2007 restriction, the District hired Applegate Group, Inc. to prepare c onstruction <br />plans for the rehabilitation of the East Dam. The construction plans were appro ved by the SEO in <br />December 2007. Given the late December 2007 approval, the District was faced with a difficult <br />decision of either delaying construction until the f all of 2008 o r placing temporary fill over the <br />east embankment with SEO approval, therefore allowing the District to fill to gauge height 30.0 <br />and recovering an additional 2,700 acre - feet of storage. Given the economic impact of reducing <br />the available w ater by 2,700 acre - feet , the District elected to place temporary fill along the east <br />embankment, with the understanding that this material would have to be removed and placed <br />again in accordance with the design specifications in the fall of 2008. The cos t of placing the <br />temporary dam embankment was appr oximately $385,000 or about $ 143 per acre - feet of <br />reclaimed storage. <br /> <br />design engineer, re - evaluated the initial idea of just <br />repairing the 1,250 feet of existing con crete parapet wall. The District did not want to get into <br />another position of having the reservoir restricted due to the failure of any portion of the existing <br />parapet wall. Given the age and condition of the existing wall, the design engineer could no t <br />re concrete parapet wall . <br />o remove the <br />entire concrete parapet wall and replace it with a sloped rip rap section, consistent with the <br />configuration of the reconstructed East Dam. The cost of removing the concrete parapet wall <br />and reconstructing the dam embankment is estimated at $422,000 and is currently under <br />construction. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.