My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJC02148
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
0001-1000
>
PROJC02148
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:14:48 AM
Creation date
11/11/2008 11:25:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153788
Contractor Name
Greeley and Loveland Irrigation Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
3
County
Weld
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Contract Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Plan otStudy -Greeley and Loveland Irrigation System Rehabilitation Feasibility Study Page 4 <br />Products: <br />1. A memorandum will be prepared describing the analytical methods and results of the existing facilities <br />evaluation. <br />2. A working D5S hydraulic model which will be given to the Company for future use. <br />3. ECI will give a one-day modeling training program for selected Company personal on the use of the DS5 <br />hydraulic model. <br />4. A system matrix which will identify problem reaches. The system matrix will be used in Task 4 <br />Alternative Development. <br />Task 4 -Alternative Development <br />Objective: <br />Several alternatives will be developed including structural and nonstructural elements in an attempt to identify <br />the least costly combination of measures for achieving the study objective. <br />Methodology: <br />1. Identify structural and non-structural pl <br />2. Preliminary evaluate plan elements to de ch are s le for further analysis. <br />3. Formulate alternatives using those plan elemen c 'e forward from the first two steps. <br />Products: <br />1. A memorandum will be prepared desc mg the methods used in formulating alternatives from the plan <br />elements. The formulated alternatives will be used in Task 5 Alternative Evaluation. <br />Task 5 -Alternative Evaluation <br />Objective: <br />The alternatives identified in Task 4 must be evaluated to distinguish the differences between them and to <br />formulate up to three sound system alternatives. <br />Methodology: <br />1. The plan elements will be formulated into system alternatives. The six evaluation factors used by the <br />CWCB will be used which include the following: <br />a. description of project outputs or yields; <br />b. project costs including capital costs, annual costs and cost per unit of output; <br />c. impacts on the man-made environment, the natural environment, and existing social structure; <br />d. the financial feasibility of the proposed project as measured by the project sponsor's ability to <br />repay all reimbursable costs; <br />e. institutional requirements for project implementation; and <br />f. any special technical problems which should be taken into consideration. <br />2. An evaluation of institutional considerations will be undertaken to obtain compliance of governmental <br />agencies and/or other parties to allow project implementation. Each major institutional considerations <br />will be described in the study report The results will be presented in a summary table format indicating <br />the type of action required. <br />F:\PROJECTS\GREELE-1\CWCB\GRELOV.PRO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.