My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes Sep 2008x
CWCB
>
Basin Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
Minutes Sep 2008x
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:57:59 PM
Creation date
10/23/2008 3:01:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
Colorado
Title
Colorado Minutes 9/08
Date
9/22/2008
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a tributary of the Crystal River. The CBRT approved $40,000 out of the basin <br />account for this purpose. <br />b. The CWCB did not approve the Battlement Reservoir 43 reservoir <br />enlargement grant request which would have improved habitat for native <br />cutthroat trout. The CBRT approved $80,000 out of the basin account for this <br />purpose. CWCB staff recommended approval, but the CWCB board tabled a <br />decision on whether to approve the grant until their November 2008 meeting. <br />The CBWC board requested more information about the water rights <br />associated with the reservoir. <br />10. The CBRT will review additional grant requests at the November 24, 2008 <br />meeting. <br />11. Report on 10825 water. Colorado River flows are currently higher than <br />normal in part due to the 10825 water being released. Current releases are: <br />Reservoir Total Release 10825 water <br />Green Mountain 1,150 cfs 700 cfs <br />Wolford Minimum flow - <br />Williams Fork 150 cfs - <br />Ruedi 300 cfs 200 cfs <br />Total 900 cfs <br />12. IBCC Report. Carlyle Currier and Stan Cazier reported that the IBCC is in the <br />process of approving a vision statement. Eric Hecox will discuss this further <br />below. <br />13. Network Study Results. Jewlya Lynn (jewlya c,csi-policy.org) of the Center for <br />Systems Integration and Lyn Kathleen (lyn.kathleen?coloradoppi.org) of the <br />Colorado Institute of Public Policy at CSU continued to lead a discussion of the <br />Network Study Results. They asked the CBRT at the August meeting to ponder <br />what the Roundtable's purpose is. Much of the meeting was spent discussing how <br />the CBRT could be meaningful when it lacked legal authority. <br />a. Obtain a unified voice. Rachel Richards noted that Front Range water <br />providers are more cohesive than they have been in the past and are speaking <br />with a more unified voice. Jewlya Lynn suggested that the CBRT needed a <br />good decision making process before it could obtain a unified voice. <br />b. Consumptive needs were not addressed. When the CBRT discussed the <br />Roundtable purposes at the August meeting, there was little if any discussion <br />of consumptive needs. <br />c. Past CBRT Votes. Jewlya asked how the CBRT has voted on issues before. <br />Votes are taken by a majority vote of the voting members present at each <br />I:AInterbasin Compact Committee\Basin Roundtables\COlorad0\Minutes\Minutes Sep 2008x.doc 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.