My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Rifle_WCPlan2008
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
DayForward
>
Rifle_WCPlan2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2011 3:58:00 PM
Creation date
9/22/2008 10:14:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Water Conservation Plan
Contract/PO #
OE PDA 08-17
Applicant
City of Rifle
Project Name
City of Rifle Water Conservation Plan
Title
City of Rifle Water Conservation Plan Final Report - July 2008
Date
7/1/2008
County
Garfield
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Complete Plan
Document Relationships
Rifle WCPlan 50%ProgReport
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
Rifle WCPlan 95%ProgReport
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
Rifle WCPlan ApprovalLtr
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
Rifle WCPlan PO
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
Rifle_WEPlan_2019
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\DayForward
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Rifle Water Conservation Plan <br />7.2 <br />Final Report -July 2008 <br />mgd. Thus, water production capacity expansion beyond 10 mgd would be deferred by <br />about 7 years as compared to the "no conservation" condition. <br />Modified Potable System Improvements Forecast <br />Re-forecasted water demands allow for the timing and capacity of water system <br />infrastructure projects to be modified. Table 7-2 below presents a summary of re- <br />forecasted water system improvement project costs. Appendix A contains a detailed <br />listing of individual projects. The main effects of conservation are: <br />• Immediate BCWTP (or other) production capacity improvements would be able to be <br />delayed one to two years (bumped from 2010 to 2011/12) <br />• The major expense for a new WTP to replace the GMWTP could be delayed by about <br />three to four years (2014 to 2017/18). <br />• A final production capacity expansion within the study period could be delayed six to <br />seven years (2025 to 2031/32). <br />• Storage/distribution improvements could be deferred about 2 years, on average. <br />• Within a 20-year planning timeframe peak day production needs could be reduced by <br />almost 1.9 mgd, which might be expected to translate into about $2.8 million in water <br />treatment capacity savings. In Table 7-2, this is accounted for by a reduction in the <br />cost of the final plant expansion, which is shown as deferred unti12031. The cost <br />savings, alternatively, could be achieved by constructing a lower-capacity <br />replacement plant for the GMWTP in 2017. <br />[Note: During development of this plan, the infrastructure plan for the "no conservation" <br />case was continuing to evolve due to changing water demand projections and in response <br />to the findings of various studies. The "no conservation" water system capital <br />improvements plan has changed since the completion of this conservation plan, and thus <br />the ability of conservation to defer certain projects will change; however, the changes are <br />not anticipated to affect the major findings of this plan -that is, the projected value of <br />conservation in reducing peak demand and long-term infrastructure capacity needs and <br />associated costs.] <br />SGM # 99055A-388 38 Integrated Resources and <br />Modified Forecasts <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.