My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Approved Minutes April 2008 CBRT
CWCB
>
Basin Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
Approved Minutes April 2008 CBRT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:56:35 PM
Creation date
8/20/2008 4:48:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
Colorado
Title
Colorado Minutes 4/08
Date
4/28/2008
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3. Cap cumulative diversions from all West Slope river basins to the East Slope at a <br />level or percent of current diversions. <br />4. Support the Seven States Agreement <br />5. Inter- and intra-state water sharing agreements that protect agriculture <br />g. Rachel Richards suggested that the vision statement should include a vision of what <br />Colorado should look like for our grandchildren. She reconullended that the state consider <br />measures such as requiring that all new approved water projects reserve water for instream <br />flows. She also expressed concern that increased agricultural efficiency could lead to less <br />groundwater and cause wells to dry up in rural areas. <br />13. Grand County Stream Flow Management Plan. Grand County consultants Peggy Bailey, <br />P.E., and Thomas A. Wesche, PhD, reported on Phase II of the Grand County Stream Flow <br />Management Plan. This plan, which has been funded in part with grants provided by the CWCB, <br />has 3 phases: <br />Phase I Review existing literature and data on Grand County stream flows. <br />Cost: $59,354 <br />Phase II Conduct PHABSIM stream habitat studies at selected sites <br /> Cost: $377,495 <br />Phase III Compare optimal and critical flows determined in PHABSIM <br /> studies against projected river flows if all conditional water rights <br /> are developed. <br />a. Peggy Bailey, P.E., Tetra Tech, Senior Hydraulic Engineer, P.O Box 1659, Breclcinridge, CO <br />80424, 970-453-6397, peggw.baile~tetratech.com, www.tetratech.com. <br />b. Thomas A. Wesche, PhD, HabiTech, Inc., P.O. Box 944, Laramie, WY 82073, 307-742- <br />4902, lwesche ~,aol.com. <br />PHABSIM studies were conducted at 11 river sites selected by Grand County and the <br />consultants in an 80-mile river corridor (see the Glossary for a definition of PHABSIM). <br />PHABSIM data was already available at 6 other sites, so 17 total sites in Grand County were <br />included in the study. Ten river transects were studied at each of the ll sites at 3 different <br />times during high, medium and low flows, for 330 total measurements. The studies tools <br />place in 2007 and took about a year to complete. Below are the results of two studied sites. <br /> Summer Winter <br /> Critical Optimal Flushing Critical Optimal <br />Muddy Creek below <br />Wolford Reservoir <br />60 cfs <br />90 <br />400-600 <br />30 <br />60 <br />Colorado River below <br />Gore Canyon <br />600 <br />1,000 <br />1,800 <br />400 <br />600 <br />d. Grand County is undertaking a Wild and Scenic River study. Phase III of the Stream Flow <br />Management Plan will consider: <br />1. Identify priority river reaches. <br />2. Conduct a time series analysis of current and fiiture water management actions. <br />I:AInterbasin Compact Cominittee~Basin Roundtables\Colorado~Minutes~Approved Munrtes Apri12008 CBRT.doc 3 g~2~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.