Laserfiche WebLink
will be made by the Grand County Stream Management Plan underscores the irrationality <br />of the CWCB's refusal to fiord the Grand County study. <br />The membership unanimously provided its conceptual approval of the Non-Consumptive <br />Needs Assessment approach taken by the Committee, as well as the two identified pilot <br />projects. <br />8. Mapping the Colorado Basin Roundtable's Water Policy Network: An overview <br />of the results of the survey was presented by representatives of the Colorado Institute of <br />Public Policy and the Center for Systems Integration. The final report is available on <br />their website at: www.csi-policy.org. There was extremely high participation by the <br />Roundtable in this survey. This was a pilot project which will now be presented to other <br />Roundtables. <br />Attendees briefly discussed the findings and reconunendations of the study. A facilitated <br />brainstorming session on what we do with the study's recommendations was suggested as <br />a "next step." <br />9. February 22, 2008 Letter from the South Platte, Metro and Arkansas Basin <br />Roundtables: The Southwest and Guniuson Roundtables have stated that they would <br />like the Colorado River Water Conservation District to take the lead on drafting some <br />"tallcing points" for a unified response to this letter. Jim Polcrandt suggested that we <br />consider sending some "formal emissaries" to the Roundtable meetings in these other <br />basins. Kirk Klancke suggested that an appropriate topic for discussion would be how <br />we meet our appropriation obligation as a state. Rachel Richards felt the response should <br />be "content rich" on the various issues we face. Tom Clark suggested that it would also <br />be appropriate to look at other obligations of the Basins (e.g., a Compact Call). <br />Ken Neubecker questioned whether the South Platte, Metro and Arkansas Basin <br />Roundtables were attempting to do the same thing that the IBCC is trying to do - <br />"exploring a range of possible solutions for Colorado's Water Supply." John Redifer <br />suggested that we may not really understand what the IBCC is doing and that we all <br />might benefit from direct communication with each other. <br />4 <br />