My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ISFAPPC01669
CWCB
>
Instream Flow Appropriations
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
ISFAPPC01669
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2017 2:14:35 PM
Creation date
7/30/2008 9:41:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Instream Flow Appropriations
Case Number
02CW0267
Stream Name
Eider Creek
Watershed
San Miguel River
Water Division
4
Water District
60
County
San Miguel
Instream Flow App - Doc Type
Supplemental Data
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Bill Owens, Governor <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />~ DQVISION OFEWILDLIFE <br />Russell George, Director <br />6060 Broadway <br />Denver, Colorado 80216 <br />Telephone: (303)297-1192 <br />10 December 2001 <br />Mr. Dan Merriman <br />Mr. Mark Uppendahl <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Stream and Lake Protection Section <br />1313 Sherman Street, Suite 721 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Subj: CDOW Instream Flow Recommendations for Eider Creek <br />Dear Dan and Mark: <br /> <br />c,°ti°~°o <br />b ~, <br />y <br />sfo~ t7F ~yq <br />For [~ldlafe- <br />ForPeople <br />The purpose of this letter is to officially transmit the Colorado Division of Wildlife's Instream flow recommendations for Eider <br />Creek in San Miguel County. The reach of stream covered by this flow recommendation is from the headwaters to the confluence <br />with the San Miguel River, a distance of approximately 2.8 rrtiles. <br />In 1996, a group of water users in the San Miguel basin convened a series of facilitated meetings to discuss a number of water <br />resource related issues that the group collectively was facing. This group identified itself as the San Miguel Basin Stakeholders <br />• Group. One of [he initiatives that emerged from these meetings was a collective desire to have Instream flows quantified for dte <br />tributary streams of the San Miguel River not currently protected with a CWCB instteam flow water right. Both the CWCB and <br />the CDOW participated in these meetings. Ken Torp, the facilitator for the stakeholders goup, sent a letter to the CWCB in 1996 <br />requesting the CWCB to initiate Instream flow quantification on the tributary streams. About that same time in history, another <br />group was forming; this group eventually became the San Miguel Watershed Coalition. The watershed coalition held a series of <br />community meetings ut the basin where agencies and members of the public identified issues that were facing the basin as a whole. <br />Foe each issue, wherever possible, goals, objectives, and strategies were developed to deal specifically with the issues. The <br />watershed coalition eventually produced a report, The San Miguel Watershed Plan. The watershed plan identified Instream flow <br />protection for the San Miguel River and its tributaries as a high priority issue. Like the stakeholders group, the CWCB and the <br />CDOW were both heavily involved in all of the meetings. <br />As a direct result of these two independent events, the San Miguel River and its tributaries became high priority areas for Instream <br />flow protection for both the CDOW and the Bureau of Land Management. BLM was heavily involved th the watershed coalition <br />effort. Starting th 1996, BLM, CWCB, and the CDOW initiated a comprehensive effort of quantifying instteam flows m the San <br />Miguel River basin. The field effort alone for this task took several years. Due to the number of potential stream segments, the <br />number of concerned groups involved, and the overall complexity of the water resource issues in the San Miguel basin, it has take <br />us nearly five years to complete the task. During this time period, we have spent a considerable amount of effort meeting with <br />concerned groups, communities, water users, county commissioners, and the general public in an effort to gain a fair amount of <br />comfort and support for the Instream flow recommendations. These flow recommendations are a culmination of a five year effort <br />involving many agencies of the federal, state, and local governments. <br />In the fall of 1996, CDOW, with the assistance of the CWCB staff, collected stream cross section information, natural environment <br />data, and other data needed to quantify Instream flow needs for Eider Creek. The stream cross section data was analyzed using <br />the R2CROSS program. The R2CROSS output was examined using the methods described in Nehring (1979) and Espegren <br />(1996). <br />• Natural Environment Studies: Eider Creek was sampled using standard electrofishing equipment approximately 1 mile above the <br />confluence with the San Miguel River. The aquatic sampling sununary (on the field data sheet) shows that a self sustaining brook <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Greg E. Walcher, Executive Director <br />W ILDLIFE COMMISSION, Rick Enstrom, Chair • Robert Shoemaker, Vice-Chair • Marianna Raftopoulos, Secretary <br />Members, Bernard Black • Tom Burke • Philip James • Bmd Phelps • Olive Valdez <br />Ex-Officio Members, Greg E. Walcher and Don Ament <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.