Laserfiche WebLink
Approach <br />The analysis performed using the State's model requires the following Glover parameter inputs: <br />T =Transmissivity in gallons per day per foot (gpd/ft). Transmissivity is the product of <br />hydraulic conductivity (K) in feet per day, saturated thickness (b) in feet, and the <br />appropriate conversion factor. <br />S =Specific Yield as a fraction <br />W =Distance from stream to impervious boundary in feet (ft) <br />x =Distance from point of recharge to stream in feet (ft) <br />Q =Recharge Rate in gallons per minute (gpm) <br />For a monthly analysis, the alluvial aquifer is "stressed" for one month (i.e. a unit of recharge is <br />applied for one month) and the amount of accretion to the river is estimated for that month and <br />subsequent months, until 100 percent of the recharge reaches the river. For a daily analysis, the <br />aquifer is "stressed" for one day, and the amount of accretion is estimated for that day and <br />subsequent days, until 100 percent of the recharge reaches the river. <br />The following approach was followed to estimate representative model parameters for western <br />slope alluvial aquifers. <br />1. Choose locations in each of the western slope basins that provide a representative sample of <br />lands irrigated from mainstem and tributary streams. <br />2. Use available geologic data from the State Engineers Office records or from geologic <br />mapping to determine appropriate parameters required for Glover analyses. <br />3. Based on the individual site values, determine average values for each Glover parameter to <br />use in an overall western slope analyses. <br />4. Determine the appropriate distance from irrigated lands to live stream (value "x") to use in <br />estimating the Glover depletion factors for lands relatively close and lands further from the <br />stream. <br />After representative parameters were selected, two monthly and two daily glover analyses were <br />performed using the State's model, representing lands irrigating relatively close and lands further <br />from the stream. The analyses resulted in monthly and daily accretions to the river due to <br />recharge through the alluvial aquifer. <br />The original CRDSS return flow patterns also included returns from surface runoff. Although <br />not discussed in the CRDSS Memo 1.15-17, the Daily Yampa Memo estimated that 50 percent <br />of total returns were from surface runoff and occurred during the same month as diversion for the <br />monthly analyses. For the daily analyses, surface runoff was estimated to reach the river the day <br />after diversion. The recharge factors from the Glover analyses were revised to include surface <br />water runoff and formatted for use in the Statemod Delay Pattern file (*.dly). <br />Page2of12 <br />