My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJC01798 (2)
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
0001-1000
>
PROJC01798 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2011 2:47:56 PM
Creation date
7/9/2008 9:29:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150265
Contractor Name
Supply Irrigating Ditch Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Boulder
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Supplemental fields
Water Division
1
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SECTIONONE <br />Introduction <br />Task 2 - Laboratory Program <br />The laboratory program was performed to verify test results presented in the 2003 Study and <br />provide data for identifying the cause of the embankment seepage. The laboratory program was <br />performed for the five borings along the dam crest not for the two borings located along the dam <br />toe. <br />The laboratory testing included index properties and shear strength testing. Index property <br />testing were used to classify the samples according to the Unified Soil Classification System and <br />included water contents and densities, percent passing the #200 sieve (fines content), Atterberg <br />Limiis, and hydrometer analyses. <br />Task 3 - Ouflet lnspection <br />The north and east outlet pipes were inspected with a video camera. The inspection was taped <br />and stored on a DVD for future use. URS prepared a summary of the condition of the pipes. <br />Task 4- 2003 Feasibility Sfudy Updafe <br />URS evaluated the alternatives presented in the 2003 Study along with a maintenance alternative <br />that was developed for this study to address the project goals. URS developed feasibility layout <br />drawings to enable the estimation of the construction cost of the maintenance alternative. <br />Quantity takeoffs were performed for the required items. URS presented the results and <br />recommendations in this study. <br />' '~,,5 1-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.